首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >More Skin, More Sun, More Tan, More Melanoma
【24h】

More Skin, More Sun, More Tan, More Melanoma

机译:更多皮肤,更多阳光,更多棕褐色,更多黑色素瘤

获取原文
           

摘要

Although personal melanoma risk factors are well established, the contribution of socioeconomic factors, including clothing styles, social norms, medical paradigms, perceptions of tanned skin, economic trends, and travel patterns, to melanoma incidence has not been fully explored. We analyzed artwork, advertisements, fashion trends, and data regarding leisure-time activities to estimate historical changes in UV skin exposure. We used data from national cancer registries to compare melanoma incidence rates with estimated skin exposure and found that they rose in parallel. Although firm conclusions about melanoma causation cannot be made in an analysis such as this, we provide a cross-disciplinary, historical framework in which to consider public health and educational measures that may ultimately help reverse melanoma incidence trends. Despite advances in its detection and treatment, melanoma remains the primary cause of mortality from skin disease in the Western world. 1,2 Improvements in the early detection of melanoma and changes in reporting practices contributed, in part, to the increase in melanoma incidence in recent decades; however, these factors alone cannot entirely account for the steady rise in tumor incidence and mortality observed during the 20th century. Several personal risk factors for developing melanoma are well established, including family history, multiple moles, fair skin, blue eyes, red hair, and freckles. 3 Environmental exposures, chiefly from UV radiation, including outdoor sunburns and indoor tanning exposure, also have been associated with increased melanoma risk. 4,5 On a population level, the contribution of changing socioeconomic factors is an intriguing variable that has not yet been fully explored, particularly the evolution of clothing styles, social norms, economic trends, available leisure time, and medical paradigms regarding UV radiation. We explore the historical relation between these factors and US melanoma incidence in the 20th century. Our goal is to illustrate how changes in fashion, perceptions of tanned skin, and socioeconomic factors have led to increased UV exposure and likely contributed to the escalation of melanoma in 20th-century America. We have divided the 20th century into 4 periods, each illustrating historical forces contributing to increases in societal exposure to UV radiation. To assess fashion and clothing trends, we reviewed artwork, consumer advertisements, and sources describing Sears department store clothing catalogs. 6–9 We also studied historical events and publicly available data regarding Americans’ leisure time and participation in outdoor activities. In an effort to illustrate the association between changing clothing styles, skin exposure to UV radiation, and the increasing melanoma incidence, we estimated skin exposure with the “rule of nines,” a standardized system traditionally used to assess percentage of body surface affected by burns. 10 We then examined the relation between skin exposure and melanoma incidence. Although they may not capture all regional, geographic, and individual subpopulation variations in UV exposure and cancer incidence rates, we used data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry, 11,12 the oldest available US cancer registry, from its inception in 1935 to the present and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) national cancer database, which incorporates population-level data from 9 to 17 different regions in the United States, depending on the time period analyzed. 11,13,14 Because the average age at diagnosis of melanoma during these decades is 50 to 60 years and early-life UV exposure is known to contribute to subsequent melanoma development, we used a postexposure lag time of 50 to 60 years in our analysis. We also explored additional societal factors that (1) led to the dramatic shift in perception of tanned skin from unattractive to desirable, (2) compelled the public to continue tanning despite evidence of the carcinogenic effects of UV exposure, and (3) sustained the indoor tanning fad of the late 20th century.
机译:尽管个人黑色素瘤的危险因素已得到充分确立,但尚未充分探索包括衣服样式,社会规范,医学范例,皮肤晒黑的看法,经济趋势和出行方式等社会经济因素对黑色素瘤发病率的影响。我们分析了艺术品,广告,时尚趋势以及有关休闲活动的数据,以估计紫外线皮肤暴露的历史变化。我们使用了来自国家癌症登记处的数据,将黑色素瘤的发生率与估计的皮肤暴露进行了比较,发现它们呈平行上升趋势。尽管无法在这样的分析中得出关于黑素瘤病因的确切结论,但我们提供了一个跨学科的历史框架,可以在其中考虑公共卫生和教育措施,这些措施最终可以帮助扭转黑素瘤的发病趋势。尽管黑色素瘤的检测和治疗取得了进步,但它仍然是西方世界皮肤病致死的主要原因。 1,2黑色素瘤早期发现的改善和报告做法的改变,部分归因于近几十年来黑色素瘤发生率的增加;然而,仅凭这些因素并不能完全解释20世纪观察到的肿瘤发病率和死亡率的稳定上升。形成黑色素瘤的几种个人危险因素已得到充分证实,包括家族病史,多痣,皮肤白皙,蓝眼睛,红头发和雀斑。 3主要来自紫外线辐射的环境暴露,包括室外晒伤和室内晒黑暴露,也与黑色素瘤风险增加有关。 4,5在人口层面,不断变化的社会经济因素的贡献是一个尚未被充分探索的有趣变量,尤其是服装款式,社会规范,经济趋势,可利用的休闲时间以及有关紫外线辐射的医学范式的演变。我们探讨了这些因素与20世纪美国黑色素瘤发病率之间的历史关系。我们的目标是说明时尚的变化,晒黑皮肤的观念以及社会经济因素如何导致紫外线暴露增加,并可能导致20世纪美国的黑色素瘤升级。我们将20世纪分为四个时期,每个时期都说明了导致社会对紫外线辐射暴露增加的历史力量。为了评估时装和服装趋势,我们回顾了艺术品,消费者广告以及描述Sears百货商店服装目录的资源。 6–9我们还研究了有关美国人休闲时间和参加户外活动的历史事件和公开数据。为了说明不断变化的服装款式,皮肤暴露于紫外线辐射和黑色素瘤发病率增加之间的关系,我们使用“九分法则”(标准为传统上用来评估烧伤影响的身体表面百分比的标准系统)估算皮肤暴露量。 。 10然后,我们检查了皮肤暴露与黑色素瘤发生率之间的关系。尽管他们可能无法捕获紫外线照射和癌症发病率的所有区域,地理和个体亚群差异,但我们使用了康涅狄格州肿瘤登记处的数据,该登记处是美国最早使用的癌症登记处11、12,始于1935年,至今监视流行病学和最终结果(SEER)国家癌症数据库,该数据库合并了美国9到17个不同地区的人口水平数据,具体取决于所分析的时间段。 11,13,14因为这几十年来诊断黑色素瘤的平均年龄为50至60岁,并且已知早期生命的紫外线暴露会导致随后的黑色素瘤发展,所以我们在分析中使用了50至60年的接触后滞后时间。我们还探讨了其他社会因素,这些因素导致(1)晒黑皮肤的感觉从没有吸引力转变为理想皮肤;(2)强迫公众继续晒黑,尽管有紫外线暴露的致癌作用的证据;(3)持续晒黑。 20世纪后期的室内晒黑时尚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号