首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Gender-Specific Associations of Objective and Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics With Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference Among Older Adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
【24h】

Gender-Specific Associations of Objective and Perceived Neighborhood Characteristics With Body Mass Index and Waist Circumference Among Older Adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

机译:在英语纵向年龄研究中,老年人的客观和感知的邻里特征与体重指数和腰围的性别特定关联

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives. We sought to determine whether objective and perceived neighborhood characteristics are independently associated with obesity indicators among older adults and whether associations differ by gender. Methods. Linear regression was used to examine mutually adjusted associations of objective area-level neighborhood deprivation and perceived individual-level neighborhood disorder in 2002–2003 with body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) 2 years later among 6297 community-dwelling older adults in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Results. Associations between neighborhood characteristics and obesity indicators were evident for women only. Being in the most deprived quintile of neighborhood deprivation was associated with a BMI that was 1.18 kilograms per meters squared higher (95% confidence interval [CI]?=?0.54, 1.83) and a WC that was 2.42 centimeters higher (95% CI?=?0.90, 3.94) at follow-up in women after adjustment for baseline health status, socioeconomic factors, and neighborhood disorder. Neighborhood disorder was not independently associated with BMI or WC. Conclusions. Among women, greater objective neighborhood deprivation was independently associated with higher BMI and WC after 2 years. Public efforts to reduce obesity among community-dwelling older women may benefit most from addressing objective residential characteristics, over and above subjective perceptions. Obesity increases the risk of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, stroke, and some types of cancer, 1 making it an important condition to prevent and manage for any population. According to 2012 estimates, one third of men and women in England between 65 and 74 years of age are considered obese, the highest percentages of any age group. 2 Although in general, levels of obesity (as measured via body mass index [BMI]) decrease after the age of 75 years, levels of abdominal adiposity (as measured via waist circumference [WC]) continue to increase with advancing age, particularly among women. 2 With a 39% increase among individuals aged 65 to 84 years and a 106% increase among those older than 85 years expected from 2012 to 2032 in England alone, 3,4 it is increasingly important to build a broader understanding of obesity risk at older ages. Obesity may be best understood within the context of its wider environmental influences. 5 Older adults may restrict much of their daily life activity to their residential environment, as a result of either retirement or functional limitations, and may consequently be more influenced by these surroundings than younger adults. 6 Thus, examining aspects of neighborhood environments may increase our understanding of obesity risk among older adults in particular. Although definitions vary, a neighborhood is broadly regarded as the area immediately surrounding one’s place of residence, measured either objectively at the area level through census data or predefined boundaries, or subjectively at the individual level through self-reported perceptions. 7 Objective neighborhood characteristics associated with an individual’s obesity risk include residential density, walkability, presence of graffiti, local access to recreational facilities, presence of green space and supermarkets, and inadequate housing; unfavorable levels of these characteristics may together form a concept known as “neighborhood deprivation.” 8,9 Associations between objective neighborhood factors and obesity risk have been shown to be gender-specific. For instance, one study showed that women living in the most deprived areas of the United Kingdom had a higher baseline BMI than those living in the least deprived areas and exhibited greater BMI increases over 13 years, 10 whereas these associations were not evident among men. By contrast, subjective neighborhood characteristics may include individual perceptions of built attributes, interpersonal relationships, or safety. A subjective general construct known as “neighborhood disorder” aims to capture perceptions of both physical and social factors by incorporating dimensions such as safety, trust of neighbors, vandalism, and area cleanliness 11 ; thus, this construct may include neighborhood characteristics that are particularly salient for the individual. Greater neighborhood disorder has been associated with higher levels of obesity indicators such as waist-to-hip ratio 11 and BMI. 12 Despite the fact that both area-level objective and individual-level perceived aspects of neighborhoods demonstrate associations with obesity risk, the independence of these associations is unknown. Furthermore, their relevance to older populations and their gender-specific nature have not been established. Evidence also suggests that effects on obesity indicators may differ. For instance, objective neighborhood deprivation has been associated with higher BMI, 10 whereas subjective neighborhood disorder has been associated with both higher BMI 12 and higher central adiposity. 11 It wou
机译:目标。我们试图确定客观和感知的邻里特征是否与老年人中的肥胖指标独立相关,以及性别之间的关联是否不同。方法。线性回归被用来检验2002年至2003年目标地区水平邻里剥夺和感知到的个人水平邻里障碍与体重指数(BMI)和腰围(WC)的相互调整的关联,两年后在6297个社区居住的老年人中在英语纵向研究中。结果。邻里特征和肥胖指标之间的关联仅对女性明显。处于邻里匮乏的最贫困的五分之一人口中,体重指数增加了1.18千克/平方米(95%置信区间[CI]?=?0.54,1.83),而WC则提高了2.42厘米(95%CI?在对基线健康状况,社会经济因素和邻里障碍进行调整后,对女性进行随访时,女性的平均年龄为= 0.90,3.94)。邻里障碍并非独立于BMI或WC。结论。在女性中,两年后客观上较高的邻里剥夺与较高的BMI和WC独立相关。除了主观感知之外,针对客观居住特征的解决方案可能最大程度地受益于为减少社区居住的老年妇女中的肥胖所做的公共努力。肥胖会增加患上心脏病,2型糖尿病,中风和某些癌症的风险,1使肥胖成为预防和控制任何人群的重要条件。根据2012年的估算,英格兰65至74岁年龄段的男女中有三分之一被认为是肥胖者,在所有年龄段中比例最高。 2尽管总体而言,肥胖程度(通过体重指数[BMI]衡量)在75岁以后会降低,但腹部肥胖程度(通过腰围[WC]衡量)会随着年龄的增长而增加,尤其是在肥胖者中女人。 2仅在英格兰,预计从2012年到2032年,年龄在65至84岁之间的人群中的比例将增加39%,而在85岁以上人群中的比例将增加106%,3,4,因此,更广泛地理解老年人的肥胖风险变得越来越重要年龄。肥胖可能是在其更广泛的环境影响的背景下得到的最佳理解。 5由于退休或功能限制,老年人可能将大部分日常生活活动限制在居住环境中,因此,与年轻人相比,这些环境可能会受到更大的影响。 6因此,检查邻里环境的各个方面可能会增加我们对老年人尤其是肥胖风险的了解。尽管定义各不相同,但邻居通常被认为是紧邻居住地的区域,可以通过人口普查数据或预先定义的边界客观地在区域级别上衡量,或者通过自我报告的看法在个人级别上主观上衡量。 7与个人肥胖风险相关的客观邻里特征包括居住密度,步行能力,涂鸦,当地使用娱乐设施,绿地和超级市场以及住房不足;这些特征的不利程度可能共同形成一个被称为“邻里剥夺”的概念。 8,9客观的邻里因素与肥胖风险之间的关联已被证明是特定于性别的。例如,一项研究表明,生活在英国最贫困地区的女性的基线BMI高于生活在最贫困地区的女性,并且在13年内BMI的增长更大,[10]而在男性中这些关联并不明显。相比之下,主观邻里特征可能包括对已建属性,人际关系或安全性的个人看法。一种被称为“邻里障碍”的主观一般构想旨在通过结合诸如安全性,对邻居的信任,故意破坏和区域清洁等方面来捕获对物理和社会因素的看法11;因此,该构造可以包括对于个体特别重要的邻域特征。更大的邻里障碍与肥胖指标(例如腰臀比11和BMI)的较高水平相关。 12尽管社区的区域层面的客观层面和个人层面的感知层面都表明存在肥胖风险,但这些关联的独立性尚不清楚。此外,还没有确定它们与老年人群的相关性和性别特征。证据还表明,对肥胖指标的影响可能有所不同。例如,客观的邻里剥夺与较高的BMI有关,[10]而主观的邻里障碍与较高的BMI [12]和较高的中央肥胖有关。 11哇

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号