...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy
【24h】

The Promise of Community-Based Participatory Research for Health Equity: A Conceptual Model for Bridging Evidence With Policy

机译:基于社区的健康公平参与性研究的承诺:将证据与政策联系起来的概念模型

获取原文
           

摘要

Insufficient attention has been paid to how research can be leveraged to promote health policy or how locality-based research strategies, in particular community-based participatory research (CBPR), influences health policy to eliminate racial and ethnic health inequities. To address this gap, we highlighted the efforts of 2 CBPR partnerships in California to explore how these initiatives made substantial contributions to policymaking for health equity. We presented a new conceptual model and 2 case studies to illustrate the connections among CBPR contexts and processes, policymaking processes and strategies, and outcomes. We extended the critical role of civic engagement by those communities that were most burdened by health inequities by focusing on their political participation as research brokers in bridging evidence and policymaking. Landmark studies have helped keep race and ethnic health inequalities on the national political agenda for more than 3 decades. These studies have included the Secretary’s Task Force on Black and Minority Health, 1 Unequal Treatment, 2 and Examining the Health Disparities Research Plan. 3 Despite the continued research evidence of disproportionate adverse health impacts on racial/ethnic minorities, 4 insufficient attention has been paid to the role of governmental action or inaction on these health disparity outcomes. How research can be leveraged to promote health equity policy, or the role of locality-based research strategies, in particular community-based participatory research (CBPR), is less understood. Two major challenges inhibit our knowledge about the link between research and policy change: (1) the gap between scientific evidence and policy action based on evidence, and (2) the difficulty of mobilizing civic engagement for policymaking in the United States. We sought to help fill these gaps by exploring 2 locality-based CBPR initiatives that have effected policy change to promote health equity. After brief overviews of the social justice basis for CBPR and health equity, the literature on CBPR policymaking for health equity, and the issues underlying the research to policy gap, we presented a new conceptual model for better understanding of the pathways and connections between CBPR contexts and processes, policymaking strategies, and policy outcomes. We summarized our case studies and then used detailed findings to illustrate the model’s utility for showcasing how CBPR might contribute, along with other efforts, to local and regional policy change. We concluded by comparing our findings with those of earlier research, and highlighted how further refinement of the conceptual model might assist CBPR partnerships in promoting health equity policy.
机译:对于如何利用研究来促进健康政策,或者基于地区的研究策略,特别是基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR),如何影响健康政策以消除种族和种族健康不公平现象,人们的关注不足。为了弥补这一差距,我们着重介绍了加利福尼亚州的两个CBPR合作伙伴所做的努力,以探索这些举措如何为卫生公平性决策做出重大贡献。我们提出了一个新的概念模型和2个案例研究,以说明CBPR上下文和流程,决策流程和策略以及结果之间的联系。通过关注作为研究经纪人的政治参与,以桥接证据和制定政策,我们扩大了健康不平等负担最重的社区的公民参与的关键作用。具有里程碑意义的研究已将种族和种族健康方面的不平等问题保持在国家政治议程上已有3多年之久了。这些研究包括秘书的黑人与少数民族健康工作队,1项不平等待遇,2项和检查健康差异研究计划。 3尽管继续有研究证据表明对种族/族裔少数群体的不良健康影响不成比例,但4政府对这些健康差距结果的行动或不作为的作用没有得到足够的重视。人们对如何利用研究来促进健康公平政策或基于地方的研究策略(尤其是基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR))的作用知之甚少。两项主要挑战阻碍了我们对研究与政策变化之间联系的认识:(1)科学证据与基于证据的政策行动之间的差距;(2)在美国动员公民参与政策制定的困难。我们试图通过探索两个基于地方的CBPR计划来帮助弥补这些差距,这些计划已经影响了政策的改变以促进健康公平。在简要概述了CBPR和健康公平的社会正义基础,有关CBPR健康公平决策的文献以及政策差距研究的基础问题之后,我们提出了一个新的概念模型,以更好地理解CBPR上下文之间的途径和联系以及流程,决策策略和政策成果。我们总结了案例研究,然后使用详细的发现来说明该模型的效用,以展示CBPR如何与其他努力一起为地方和区域政策变更做出贡献。我们通过将我们的研究结果与早期研究的结果进行比较得出结论,并强调了概念模型的进一步完善将如何帮助CBPR伙伴关系促进健康公平政策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号