首页> 外文期刊>American journal of public health >Symposium on Integrating the Science of Environmental Justice into Decision-Making at the Environmental Protection Agency: An Overview
【24h】

Symposium on Integrating the Science of Environmental Justice into Decision-Making at the Environmental Protection Agency: An Overview

机译:在环境保护署的“将环境正义科学纳入决策”专题讨论会

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In March 2010, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) collaborated with government and nongovernmental organizations to host a groundbreaking symposium, “Strengthening Environmental Justice Research and Decision Making: A Symposium on the Science of Disproportionate Environmental Health Impacts.” The symposium provided a forum for discourse on the state of scientific knowledge about factors identified by EPA that may contribute to higher burdens of environmental exposure or risk in racial/ethnic minorities and low-income populations. Also featured were discussions on how environmental justice considerations may be integrated into EPA's analytical and decision-making frameworks and on research needs for advancing the integration of environmental justice into environmental policymaking. We summarize key discussions and conclusions from the symposium and briefly introduce the articles in this issue. IN 2009, THE US ENVIRON mental Protection Agency (EPA) initiated activities to formalize and ensure the assessment and consideration of environmental justice issues in its regulatory decisions, particularly in the context of developing regulations. EPA's direction reflects a commitment to fully implement a 1994 executive order, “Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations” (EO 12898), 1 which requires EPA to identify and address any disproportionate environmental and health impacts that its policies, activities, and programs may have on minority and low-income populations. This direction is also consistent with the stated commitment of EPA administrator Lisa P. Jackson to include environmental justice principles in all of the agency's decisions. 2 The mandate of EO 12898 and the actions of the agency are grounded in a body of evidence that demonstrates a disproportionate distribution of environmental harms and risks to racial/ethnic minority, indigenous, and low-income populations in the United States. Ample evidence shows that these populations reside in communities where sources of environmental hazards are more likely to be located and to be more concentrated. 3 – 9 These populations are more likely to experience higher exposures to environmental pollution because of where they live, work, and play 10 – 19 and to bear higher burdens of such adverse health outcomes as elevated blood lead, asthma, preterm births, and morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular diseases. 18 – 28 Additional information on the subject of disproportionate environmental and health impacts experienced by these population groups is available in the general scientific and public health literature. 29 – 52 .
机译:2010年3月,美国环境保护署(EPA)与政府和非政府组织合作举办了具有开创性的专题讨论会,“加强环境正义研究与决策:环境健康影响不成比例专题讨论会”。该专题讨论会提供了一个论坛,以讨论有关EPA确定的因素的科学知识现状,这些因素可能导致环境暴露负担或种族/族裔少数群体和低收入人群的风险增加。会议还讨论了如何将环境正义考虑因素纳入EPA的分析和决策框架,以及有关促进将环境正义纳入环境政策制定的研究需求的讨论。我们总结了研讨会的主要讨论和结论,并简要介绍了本期的文章。 2009年,美国环境心理保护局(EPA)开展了活动,以在其监管决策中,尤其是在制定法规的背景下,正式确定并确保评估和考虑环境正义问题。 EPA的方向反映了对全面执行1994年行政命令“解决少数民族和低收入人群的环境正义的联邦行动”(EO 12898), 1 的承诺,其中要求EPA识别并解决任何其政策,活动和计划可能对少数民族和低收入人群造成不成比例的环境和健康影响。此方向也与EPA管理员Lisa P. Jackson承诺将环境正义原则纳入该机构的所有决定相一致。 2 EO 12898的任务授权和该机构的行动基于大量证据表明,环境危害和风险在美国对种族/少数民族,土著和低收入人群的分布不成比例。充分的证据表明,这些人口居住在更容易发现环境危害和更加集中环境的社区中。 3 – 9 这些人口由于以下原因更容易遭受环境污染:他们生活,工作和娱乐的地方 10 – 19 ,并承担更高的不良健康负担,如血铅升高,哮喘,早产以及心血管疾病的发病率和死亡率。 18 – 28 有关这些人群的环境和健康影响不成比例的主题的其他信息,可在一般科学和公共卫生文献中找到。 29 – 52

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号