首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Geographic Information System >Study the Behavior of Total Least Squares Technique in Adjusting GPS Field Data - A Case Study
【24h】

Study the Behavior of Total Least Squares Technique in Adjusting GPS Field Data - A Case Study

机译:全最小二乘技术在GPS野外数据校正中的行为研究-以案例研究为例

获取原文
       

摘要

The main research fields in mathematical and satellite geodesy are computations and adjustment to assess the magnitude of errors and to study their distributions in terms of when they are within the adequate tolerance. In order to achieve this study’s objective, a GPS field direct results were adjusted using Least Squares (LS) and Total Least Squares (TLS) techniques. The difference between the LS and TLS, is that the first recognizes errors only in the observation matrix, adjusting observations in order to get the sum of their squared residuals minimum, whereas the latter acknowledge errors in both the observation matrix and design matrix, which minimizes the noise in both matrices. We used two case studies in this research, the first case study deals with baselines up to 30 km; and second one deals with baselines up to 4 km. The applied two solutions demonstrate that the result from LS technique is approximately the same of TLS on GPS network adjustment in some cases. This study main purpose is to compare the efficiency of the LS and TLS, assessing their individual accuracy and selecting the most effective method in adjusting GPS baselines. Based on statistical indicators of mean and root mean square error each model was assessed. After applying the LS and TLS techniques individually for the same data sets, it is noticed that, LS and TLS in the first case study gave root mean square error equal to 5.01mm and 5.12mm respectively. Again, in the second case study, both techniques gave the same results. Accordingly, this study highlights the efficiency of LS and TLS in solving different problems in satellite geodesy.
机译:数学和卫星大地测量学的主要研究领域是计算和调整,以评估误差的大小并根据何时在适当的公差范围内来研究误差的分布。为了达到这项研究的目的,使用最小二乘(LS)和总最小二乘(TLS)技术对GPS野外直接测量结果进行了调整。 LS和TLS之间的区别在于,前者仅在观测矩阵中识别错误,调整观测值以使其残差平方和最小,而后者则在观测矩阵和设计矩阵中均承认误差,从而将误差最小化两种矩阵中的噪声。在这项研究中,我们使用了两个案例研究,第一个案例研究的对象是长达30 km的基线。第二个基准线的最大距离为4 km。应用的两种解决方案表明,在某些情况下,LS技术的结果与TLS在GPS网络调整中的结果大致相同。这项研究的主要目的是比较LS和TLS的效率,评估它们的个体准确性,并选择最有效的方法来调整GPS基线。基于均值和均方根误差的统计指标,对每个模型进行了评估。在将LS和TLS技术分别应用于相同的数据集后,应注意的是,在第一个案例研究中,LS和TLS的均方根误差分别等于5.01mm和5.12mm。同样,在第二个案例研究中,两种技术都给出了相同的结果。因此,本研究强调了LS和TLS在解决卫星大地测量学中不同问题方面的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号