首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Pediatrics >Parental Satisfaction on Multiple Daily Injections, Insulin Pump and Flexible Multiple Daily Injections Used for Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
【24h】

Parental Satisfaction on Multiple Daily Injections, Insulin Pump and Flexible Multiple Daily Injections Used for Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

机译:父母对1型糖尿病儿童每日多次注射,胰岛素泵和灵活多次每日注射的满意度

获取原文
           

摘要

Aims: This study aims to identify differences in parental satisfaction between three distinct types of intensive insulin therapies used for children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) namely multiple daily injection (MDI), continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and flexible multiple daily injection (fMDI). Materials and Methods: Data was collected over a 6-month period during the quarterly clinic visits. Two modified versions of validated tools-Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), were electronically filled in by the parents of children with T1D. This provided information on parental satisfaction on the following areas: inconvenience of regimen, lifestyle flexibility, impression of glycaemic control, fear of hypoglycaemia, diabetic symptoms, treatment barriers, worry, treatment adherence and communication. Results: 34 parents completed the electronic data forms on iSurvey. Parents of the fMDI group were the most confident to avoid severe hypoglycaemia whereas MDI-parents being the least confident, t (21) = 2.12, p = 0.046. There was no statistical difference noted on how confident parents felt to avoid asymptomatic hypoglycaemia, their worry about nocturnal hypoglycaemia, convenience and ease of using insulin in public places, nor was there statistically significant difference in the pain and discomfort felt by their children. Parents of children with fMDI felt the time their children spent with hyperglycemia was higher than the MDI, t (21) = 2.11, p = 0.047. Parents of the CSII group were most likely to continue their current treatment and were also, most likely to recommend the treatment regimen to others. Parents of MDI were least likely to do so, t (20) = 2.12, p =.047 and t (18) = 2.35, p = 0.031. Conclusion: Although this study was conducted with a very small sample size, it has revealed no significant difference in parental satisfaction among MDI, CSII and fMDI groups including parental anxiety and stress, ease of use in public places, convenience, flexibility, parental perception of pain and discomfort experienced by their children and fear of nocturnal hypoglycaemia. However, parents indicated greater confidence in avoiding severe hypoglycaemia in fMDI albeit there was higher glycaemic variability. Parents with CSII were more satisfied with treatment and more likely to recommend their current treatment option to others, than fMDI and MDI, as the preferred mode of treatment.
机译:目的:本研究旨在确定用于1型糖尿病(T1D)儿童的三种不同类型的强化胰岛素治疗之间的父母满意度差异,即每日多次注射(MDI),连续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)和灵活多次每日注射( fMDI)。资料和方法:在季度门诊期间的6个月内收集数据。患有T1D儿童的父母以电子方式填写了经过验证的工具的两个修改版本-胰岛素治疗满意度问卷(ITSQ)和糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)。这在以下方面提供了父母满意度的信息:方案的不便,生活方式的灵活性,对血糖控制的印象,对低血糖症的恐惧,糖尿病症状,治疗障碍,担忧,治疗依从性和沟通。结果:34位家长在iSurvey上填写了电子数据表格。 fMDI组的父母最有信心避免发生严重的低血糖症,而MDI父母的最不自信,t(21)= 2.12,p = 0.046。父母对避免无症状低血糖,对夜间低血糖的担心,在公共场所使用胰岛素的便利性和易用性的信心方面,没有统计学差异。在孩子的疼痛和不适方面,也没有统计学上的显着差异。患有fMDI的孩子的父母感到他们的孩子患有高血糖症的时间高于MDI,t(21)= 2.11,p = 0.047。 CSII组的父母最有可能继续目前的治疗,也最有可能向其他人推荐治疗方案。 MDI的父母这样做的可能性最小,t(20)= 2.12,p = .047,t(18)= 2.35,p = 0.031。结论:尽管这项研究的样本量很小,但并未发现MDI,CSII和fMDI组在父母满意度上有显着差异,包括父母的焦虑和压力,在公共场所的易用性,便利性,灵活性,父母对他们的孩子经历的疼痛和不适以及对夜间低血糖症的恐惧。然而,尽管血糖变异性较高,但父母表示对避免fMDI中严重低血糖症的信心更大。与fMDI和MDI相比,CSII的父母对治疗更满意,并且更有可能向其他人推荐他们当前的治疗选择,将其作为首选治疗方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号