首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >Comparison of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (a new test) with modified Mallampati test in predicting difficult visualization of larynx
【24h】

Comparison of acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (a new test) with modified Mallampati test in predicting difficult visualization of larynx

机译:比较肩峰胸骨上切口指数(一项新测试)与改良Mallampati测试在预测喉困难可视化方面的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: We aimed to compare the efficacy of a new bedside screening test named acromioaxillosuprasternal notch index (AASI) with modified Mallampati (MMP). Methods: A total of 603 adult patients, who were candidates for tracheal intubation in elective surgery, were enrolled in this prospective study. Preoperative airway assessment was carried out with AASI and MMP. The new AASI score is calculated based on the following measurements: (1) using a ruler, a vertical line is drawn from the top of the acromion process to the superior border of the axilla at the pectoralis major muscle (line A); (2) a second line is drawn perpendicular to line A from the suprasternal notch (line B); and (3) the portion of line A that lies above the point where line B intersects it is line C. AASI is calculated by dividing the length of line C by that of line A (AASI = C/A). After induction of anesthesia, the laryngeal view was recorded according to the Cormack-Lehane grading system. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to compare between AASI and MMP. Results: Difficult visualization of larynx (DVL, Cormack-Lehane III and IV) was observed in 38 (6.3%) patients. The best cutoff point for DVL was defined at AASI > 0.49. AASI had a lower false negative rate and higher predictive values (sensitivity, positive predictive value, and accuracy) in comparison with MMP. Conclusion: AASI was associated with higher predictive values than MMP and could be used for estimation of DVL.
机译:背景:我们的目的是比较一种新的床旁筛查测试的功效,该测试称为改良的Mallampati(MMP)的肩峰上胸骨切迹指数(AASI)。方法:本研究共纳入了603名成年患者,这些患者是进行择期气管插管的候选人。术前用AASI和MMP进行气道评估。新的ASI评分是根据以下测量结果计算得出的:(1)使用尺子,从肩峰过程的顶部到胸大肌的腋窝上边界画一条垂直线(线A); (2)从胸骨上切口(B线)垂直于A线绘制第二条线; (3)线A位于线B相交点上方的部分是线C。AASI是通过将线C的长度除以线A的长度(AASI = C / A)而得出的。麻醉诱导后,根据Cormack-Lehane评分系统记录喉镜视图。接收器工作特性曲线分析用于比较AASI和MMP。结果:38例患者(6.3%)观察到了喉头(DVL,Cormack-Lehane III和IV)的困难可视化。 DVL的最佳截止点定义为AASI> 0.49。与MMP相比,AASI具有更低的假阴性率和更高的预测值(敏感性,阳性预测值和准确性)。结论:AASI的预测值高于MMP,可用于DVL的估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号