首页> 外文期刊>Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica : >A combination of the modified Mallampati score, thyromental distance, anatomical abnormality, and cervical mobility (M-TAC) predicts difficult laryngoscopy better than Mallampati classification
【24h】

A combination of the modified Mallampati score, thyromental distance, anatomical abnormality, and cervical mobility (M-TAC) predicts difficult laryngoscopy better than Mallampati classification

机译:改良的Mallampati评分,胸膜距离,解剖异常和子宫颈活动度(M-TAC)的组合预测困难的喉镜检查比Mallampati分类更好

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: Unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in anesthetized patients. A number of modules have been developed to predict difficult airways, but they are often complex in nature. We combined the modified Mallampati score (M), thyromental distance (T), anatomical abnormality (A), and cervical mobility (C) into a single scoring system with the acronym M-TAC, and evaluated it against Mallampati scoring. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 500 adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I or II, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia. Preoperative airway assessments using M-TAC were performed, all of which were given a score. Anesthesiologists, blinded to the pre-anesthetic airway assessment, performed laryngoscopy and graded the laryngoscopic view as per Cormack and Lehane's classification. For the study purpose, difficult laryngoscopy was defined as Cormack and Lehane Grade 3 or 4 of laryngoscopic view. Results: An M-TAC score >= 4 had a significantly higher sensitivity (96% vs. 72%) and specificity (86% vs. 78%) with a high positive predictive value (44% vs. 28%) and a very low false negative value (2% vs. 15%) in comparison with Mallampati scoring (p < 0.05). Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting difficult laryngoscopy revealed an area under the curve of 0.83 (95% CI = 0.78-0.88) for Mallampati scoring and 0.94 (95% CI = 0.92-0.96) for M-TAC scoring system. Conclusion: The M-TAC scoring system has provided a higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting difficult laryngoscopy in comparison with Mallampati classification.
机译:目的:意想不到的困难气管插管是麻醉患者发病和死亡的重要原因。已经开发出许多模块来预测困难的气道,但是它们本质上通常很复杂。我们将修改后的Mallampati评分(M),胸膜距离(T),解剖异常(A)和宫颈活动度(C)组合成一个首字母缩写词M-TAC的评分系统,并针对Mallampati评分进行了评估。方法:我们前瞻性分析了500例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I或II级成年患者,这些患者计划在全身麻醉下进行择期手术。使用M-TAC进行术前气道评估,所有评估均得到评分。麻醉医师对麻醉前的气道评估不知情,他们根据Cormack和Lehane的分类对喉镜进行了喉镜检查,并对喉镜进行了分级。出于研究目的,喉镜检查被定义为喉镜检查的Cormack和Lehane 3或4级。结果:M-TAC得分> = 4的敏感性(96%vs. 72%)和特异性(86%vs. 78%)明显更高,阳性预测值较高(44%vs. 28%),并且与Mallampati评分相比,假阴性值较低(2%比15%)(p <0.05)。分析接收器工作特征(ROC)曲线以预测困难的喉镜检查发现,曲线下的面积对于Mallampati得分为0.83(95%CI = 0.78-0.88),对于M-TAC得分为0.94(95%CI = 0.92-0.96)系统。结论:与Mallampati分类法相比,M-TAC评分系统在预测困难的喉镜检查方面具有更高的灵敏度和特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号