首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Economics >Preserving the Future and Global Trade Relations: Impacts of Recent Global Developments
【24h】

Preserving the Future and Global Trade Relations: Impacts of Recent Global Developments

机译:维护未来和全球贸易关系:最近全球发展的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

As the United States looks set to order an imposition of tariffs on aluminum (10%) and steel (25%) imports during the first week of March 2018, the announcement does not only appear to be unsettling financial markets, but also triggering further questions relating to whether the announcement signifies the era of protectionist stances – as well as repercussions over possible retaliations by its closest trading partners - and whether the intended aims of such tariffs – namely the protection of jobs, will eventually be countered by detrimental impacts to technological firms and industrial companies. How do we address challenges presented by unequal distribution of the benefits of globalization? Such that the imposition of unduly high tariffs – as well as anti-dumping measures, do not offset positive gains to be derived from trade liberalization and globalization. This special issue highlights progress, rationales and developments attributed to world trade rounds such as the Uruguay and Doha trade rounds – as well as challenges and shortcomings of these rounds. It also aims to highlight and address challenges presented to global trade relations as a result of the failure of central bankers to appreciate fully the consequences and impact – as well as contribution of emerging economies to all time low levels of inflation. This has not been demonstrated in the build up to the 2008 Financial Crisis, but also prompting the introduction of Basel III regulations – and particularly the 2010 Basel leverage ratio.
机译:由于美国似乎将在2018年3月的第一周下令对铝(10%)和钢(25%)进口征收关税,这一公告不仅似乎使金融市场不安,而且引发了进一步的疑问有关该公告是否预示着保护主义立场的时代-以及对其最密切贸易伙伴可能采取的报复行动的影响-以及此类关税的预期目的(即保护工作)最终能否通过对科技公司的不利影响来抵消和工业公司。我们如何应对全球化带来的利益分配不均带来的挑战?这样,征收过高的关税以及反倾销措施并不能抵消贸易自由化和全球化带来的积极收益。本期特刊着重指出了乌拉圭和多哈等世界贸易回合所取得的进步,理论基础和发展,以及这些回合所面临的挑战和不足。它还旨在突出并解决由于中央银行未能充分理解其后果和影响以及新兴经济体对历来较低的通货膨胀水平的贡献而给全球贸易关系带来的挑战。在2008年金融危机的爆发中并未证明这一点,但也促使引入了《巴塞尔协议III》法规,尤其是2010年《巴塞尔协议》的杠杆比率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号