首页> 外文期刊>Africa Spectrum >China’s and Japan’s Foreign Aid Policies vis-à-vis Lusophone Africa
【24h】

China’s and Japan’s Foreign Aid Policies vis-à-vis Lusophone Africa

机译:中国和日本针对非洲裔非洲人的外交援助政策

获取原文
           

摘要

This article compares the evolution of China’s and Japan’s foreign policies to Lusophone Africa, focusing on the period post-2000. The lack of analysis on Beijing’s and Tokyo’s respective aid policies towards Portuguese-speaking African countries (Países Africanos de Língua Oficial Portuguesa, PALOP) makes this study relevant. Arguably, Japan’s development “edge” over China in terms of the “aid model” approach towards PALOP countries is under threat. This raises questions about China’s changing pattern of aid, characterised by an increasing amount of “soft” aid towards PALOP states outside of trade and investment relations, which is much in line with Japan’s aid philosophy and, according to observers, less neocolonialist than Japan’s previous aid practices. This paper asks which model of cooperation is morally better and which is more effective, as both donors have interests in PALOP countries beyond development assistance. It finds complementarities in the two countries’ aid allocation to PALOP states, such as poverty eradication given the sectoral diversity of Chinese aid, and the empowerment of local communities fostered by Japanese aid’s emphasis on grassroots and human-security projects.
机译:本文比较了中国和日本对非洲裔非洲人的外交政策的演变,重点是2000年以后的时期。缺乏对北京和东京对葡语非洲国家的援助政策的分析(PALOP)。可以说,就对PALOP国家的“援助模式”而言,日本在中国的发展“优势”正受到威胁。这就引起了人们对中国援助方式变化的质疑,其特征是对贸易和投资关系以外的PALOP国家的“软”援助数量不断增加,这与日本的援助理念非常相符,据观察家称,新殖民主义主义的程度低于日本援助做法。本文询问哪种合作模式在道德上会更好,哪种合作模式会更有效,因为这两个捐助方都对PALOP国家感兴趣,而不仅仅是发展援助。它发现两国在向PALOP州分配的援助中具有互补性,例如鉴于中国援助的部门多样性,消除了贫困,以及日本援助强调基层和人类安全项目而促进了当地社区的赋权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号