首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics >Testing the Consistency of Subjective Weights in Goal Programming – the Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach
【24h】

Testing the Consistency of Subjective Weights in Goal Programming – the Analytical Hierarchy Process Approach

机译:在目标规划中测试主观权重的一致性–层次分析法

获取原文
           

摘要

In the context of multi-criteria decision making every individual will act as a decision maker. The decision maker is involved in assigning preferences or weights to the alternatives. Goal programming will also come under the hub of MCDA, where the DM will assign the subjective weights to each goal. By giving so, the weighted sum of deviations will be minimized to some extent but one cannot ascertain whether the weights are consistent or not. In this paper the authors have proposed a simpler way of testing the consistency of weights and demonstrated an easier way to achieve the minimized weighted sum of deviations through AHP. This attempt showed better results and allows the DM to think well before giving the weights to each goal.
机译:在多标准决策的背景下,每个人都将充当决策者。决策者参与为备选方案分配偏好或权重。目标编程也将落入MCDA的中心,DM将在该中心为每个目标分配主观权重。这样一来,偏差的加权总和将在某种程度上最小化,但是人们无法确定权重是否一致。在本文中,作者提出了一种测试权重一致性的简单方法,并演示了一种通过AHP来实现最小化加权加权总和的简便方法。这种尝试显示出更好的结果,并使DM可以在权衡每个目标之前进行思考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号