首页> 外文期刊>Alborz University Medical Journal >Survey of Safety Climate in a Petrochemical Industry in Mahshahr
【24h】

Survey of Safety Climate in a Petrochemical Industry in Mahshahr

机译:Mahshahr石化行业的安全气候调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Background and Aim: Safety Climate as one of the health and safety management performance evaluation indicators is discussed. The purpose of this study was to plot the safety climate of the under study Petrochemical industry and evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses. Methods: Loughborough University Safety Climate Assessment Toolkit (LSCAT) was used in this study which assesses the safety climate governs on the workplace in 17 dimensions. Nine of them deal with attitude of workers directly and three of them deal with Organizational activity and fine of them via interview, deal with issues such as management style, Cooperation and etc. 1 to 10 scale is used for scoring each dimension. Results and Discussion: Average score of the industry's safety climate was obtained 5.9. Of 17 studied dimensions, 9 dimensions were weak (score less than 6). Lowest score were related to Event & Accident and Change management dimensions. Highest score were related to Individual priorities and need for safety (8.65). Generally relationship between individual variables (ages, work experience, education) and safety climate were not significant (P0.05). Conclusion: Generally one can conclude that individual variables such as age, education and experience have not significant effect on safety climate. It seems that top management forms the organizational climate and consequently safety climate. It reaffirms the basic principle of senior management commitment to safety and its role in preventing accidents. Thus safety climate can be used as a good method for assessing Occupational Health and Safety Management Performance.
机译:背景与目的:探讨安全气候作为健康与安全管理绩效评价指标之一。这项研究的目的是绘制正在研究的石化行业的安全气候,并评估其优缺点。方法:本研究使用拉夫堡大学安全气候评估工具包(LSCAT),该工具包从17个维度评估工作场所的安全气候状况。其中有9个直接处理工人的态度,其中3个处理组织活动并通过面谈对其进行罚款,处理诸如管理风格,合作等问题。每个维度使用1到10的评分标准。结果与讨论:获得该行业安全环境的平均分5.9。在研究的17个维度中,有9个维度较弱(得分小于6)。最低分与事件和事故及变更管理维度有关。最高分与个人优先级和对安全性的需求有关(8.65)。一般而言,个体变量(年龄,工作经验,受教育程度)与安全环境之间的关系不显着(P> 0.05)。结论:通常可以得出这样的结论:年龄,文化程度和经验等个体变量对安全气候没有显着影响。高层管理人员似乎形成了组织氛围,因此也形成了安全氛围。它重申了高级管理层对安全的承诺的基本原则及其在预防事故中的作用。因此,安全气候可以用作评估职业健康和安全管理绩效的好方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号