首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Analytical Chemistry >Analytical Methods Comparison for the Determination of Bilirubin in Blood Samples of Neonates
【24h】

Analytical Methods Comparison for the Determination of Bilirubin in Blood Samples of Neonates

机译:新生儿血样中胆红素分析方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Analytical methods comparison for the determination of bilirubin in blood samples of neonates was compared to facilitate reliable clinical decision, detect hyperbilirubinemia (neonatal jaundice) or kernicterus in neonates. Details of analytical features such as accuracy, speed, sensitivity, specificity, the robustness of the methodologies/techniques compared are not well presented in some cases. In this prospective study carried out at Neonatal Special Care Unit (NSCU) of Nisa Premier Hospital Abuja, two methods: Total Serum Bilirubin (TSB) determination by direct spectrophotometry and Transcutaneous Bilirubinometry (TcB) by Jaundice Meter were compared using paired data of blood samples analysed respectively from 245 neonates<36 weeks. Data analysis was performed using Analyse-it? version 4.6 method validation software for Microsoft Excel. The overall mean value obtained by TcB (10.64±2.97mg/dl) was higher than the TSB (10.22±2.80 mg/dl), which was significantly different (ANOVA, p<.000). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a good agreement between TcB and TSB measurements (r = 0.976) but with an overestimation by TcB compared with evaluation with TSB (calculated by TcB-TSB), which was 2.95±17.84 mg/dl (95% CI = -0.85mg/dl to 1.70mg/dl). Relevant cut-off values were assessed and revealed that at 15mg/dl TcB provided 100% sensitivity (Area under the Curve - AUC = 99.6%) and 80% specificity. However at 13mg/dl TcB provided 98% sensitivity (AUC = 98.6%) and 66% specificity. It can be concluded that the use of TcB for bilirubin measurement in clinically jaundiced neonates is a rapid analytical methodology and the suitable alternative of TSB. However for safest clinical decisions bilirubin measurement by HPLC remains the gold standard methodology and is advocated.
机译:为了确定可靠的临床决策,检测新生儿的高胆红素血症(新生儿黄疸)或角膜肌,对分析新生儿血液样品中胆红素的方法进行了比较。在某些情况下,无法很好地显示分析功能的详细信息,例如准确性,速度,灵敏度,特异性,所比较方法/技术的稳定性。在Nisa Premier Hospital Abuja的新生儿特殊护理部门(NSCU)进行的这项前瞻性研究中,使用了血样配对数据,比较了两种方法:直接分光光度法测定总血清胆红素(TSB)和黄疸仪经皮胆红素测定(TcB)。分别对245个<36周的新生儿进行了分析。使用Analyse-it?进行数据分析。适用于Microsoft Excel的4.6版方法验证软件。 TcB获得的总体平均值(10.64±2.97mg / dl)高于TSB(10.22±2.80 mg / dl),差异显着(ANOVA,p <.000)。 Bland-Altman分析表明TcB和TSB测量值之间有很好的一致性(r = 0.976),但与TSB评估(TcB-TSB计算)相比,TcB高估了2.95±17.84 mg / dl(95%CI = -0.85mg / dl至1.70mg / dl)。评估了相关的临界值,发现在15mg / dl时,TcB可提供100%的敏感性(曲线下面积-AUC = 99.6%)和80%的特异性。但是,在13mg / dl的条件下,TcB提供了98%的灵敏度(AUC = 98.6%)和66%的特异性。可以得出结论,在临​​床黄疸型新生儿中使用TcB进行胆红素测量是一种快速的分析方法,是TSB的合适替代品。然而,为了最安全的临床决策,通过HPLC进行胆红素测量仍然是金标准方法,并被提倡。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号