...
首页> 外文期刊>AIMS Energy >The techno-economic viability of bio-synthetic natural gas production utilising willow grown on contaminated land
【24h】

The techno-economic viability of bio-synthetic natural gas production utilising willow grown on contaminated land

机译:利用在污染土地上生长的柳树生产生物合成天然气的技术经济可行性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The growth of energy crops on contaminated land offers two potential advantages over their growth on agricultural land. Firstly, it can clean the land of contaminants, remediating it for future development or agricultural use. Secondly by growing energy crops on such land there is no conflict with land that is suitable for other uses (primarily agriculture). This study examines the opportunity to grow willow on contaminated land and to use this crop to produce bio-synthetic-natural-gas via the gasification processing route. The impact on the gasification system of using the contaminated materials as a feedstock is examined. A process that utilises a steam and oxygen blown gasifier with a plasma gas cleaning step and subsequent syngas cleaning is found most effective. An economic analysis of the process is undertaken to assess the viability of the opportunity. The results show that the costs associated with using the system to remediate land are lower than conventional alternatives, but require forward temporal planning which is not often evident or possible. Cost viability, if considered only for energy production, depends on the feedstock selling for a significantly lower price than virgin feedstock (in many cases requiring a gate fee), alongside a combination of strong policy incentives, natural gas prices and a long-term demand for gas products. For a 20 MW output system the feedstock would require a gate fee of £30 or £70 per tonne (depending on the policy support claimed), whilst for a 50 MW system a £25 gate fee or £30 cost per tonne are needed. Larger gasifiers are more economically viable, but provision of material grown from contaminated land would be unlikely to fulfil demand. Therefore, coupling systems with waste material as a feedstock is beneficial, but has resultant policy implications as current financial incentives are different for such materials.
机译:能源作物在受污染土地上的生长比在农用土地上的生长具有两个潜在的优势。首先,它可以清洁土地上的污染物,将其修复以用于将来的开发或农业用途。其次,通过在此类土地上种植能源作物,与适合其他用途的土地(主要是农业)没有冲突。这项研究探讨了在受污染的土地上种植柳树并利用这种作物通过气化加工路线生产生物合成天然气的机会。研究了使用受污染的材料作为原料对气化系统的影响。发现一种利用带有等离子气体清洁步骤并随后进行合成气清洁的蒸汽和氧气吹气气化器的方法是最有效的。对流程进行了经济分析,以评估机会的可行性。结果表明,与使用该系统进行土地修复相关的成本低于传统的替代方法,但需要前瞻性的时间规划,而这通常并不明显或不可能。如果仅考虑能源生产,则成本可行性取决于原材料的售价要比原始原材料的价格低很多(在许多情况下,需要入门费),同时还要有强有力的政策激励措施,天然气价格和长期需求用于天然气产品。对于20兆瓦输出系统,原料将需要每吨30或70英镑的入场费(取决于所要求的政策支持),而对于50兆瓦系统,原料将需要25吨或每吨30英镑的入场费。较大的气化炉在经济上更可行,但从受污染的土地上种植的材料将无法满足需求。因此,将废料作为原料的耦合系统是有益的,但是由于当前的财政激励措施对于此类物质而言是不同的,因此具有政策意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号