...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Agricultural Research >Assessment of rural households cooking energy choice during kerosene subsidy in Nigeria: A case study of Oluyole Local Government Area of Oyo State
【24h】

Assessment of rural households cooking energy choice during kerosene subsidy in Nigeria: A case study of Oluyole Local Government Area of Oyo State

机译:尼日利亚对煤油补贴期间农村家庭烹饪能源选择的评估:以奥约州Oluyole地方政府地区为例

获取原文

摘要

The choice of domestic cooking energy in rural Nigeria is an issue for addressing deforestation and health hazards resulting from indoor air pollution. The study compared the demand for different cooking energy sources before and after implementation of kerosene subsidy and determined the correlates of choosing fuel wood/charcoal. The data were collected with structured questionnaires administered to 120 respondents that were selected randomly. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and Seemingly Unrelated Bivariate Probit (SUBP) regression. The results revealed that the proportion of households that depended on kerosene increased from 49.2% before the subsidy to 60.83% after the subsidy. Also 16.67 and 14.17% of the respondents collected firewood before and after the subsidy, respectively. Furthermore 6.67% of the respondents indicated that kerosene was scarce after the subsidy, as against 41.67% that indicated same before subsidy. The SUBP regression results revealed that using fuel wood/charcoal as cooking fuel before subsidy significantly reduced the probability of choosing fuel wood/charcoal after subsidy (p<0.05). As the price of kerosene increased, the probability of using fuel wood/charcoal significantly decreased (p<0.01). It was concluded that subsidy on kerosene portends a very high likelihood of leading to reduction in deforestation and indoor air pollution due to less usage of fuel wood/charcoal.
机译:尼日利亚农村地区家庭烹饪能源的选择是解决因室内空气污染而造成的森林砍伐和健康危害的问题。该研究比较了实施煤油补贴前后不同烹饪能源的需求,并确定了选择薪柴/木炭的相关性。数据是通过对120位随机选择的受访者进行结构化问卷调查而收集的。使用描述性统计数据和看似无关的双变量概率(SUBP)回归分析数据。结果表明,依靠煤油的家庭比例从补贴前的49.2%增加到补贴后的60.83%。在补贴前后,分别有16.67和14.17%的受访者收集了柴火。此外,有6.67%的受访者表示补贴后煤油稀缺,而在补贴前则为41.67%。 SUBP回归结果显示,补贴前使用薪柴/木炭作为烹饪燃料显着降低了补贴后选择薪柴/木炭的可能性(p <0.05)。随着煤油价格的上涨,使用薪柴/木炭的可能性大大降低(p <0.01)。结论是,由于减少了薪柴/木炭的使用,对煤油的补贴预示着极有可能导致森林砍伐和室内空气污染的减少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号