...
首页> 外文期刊>African Journal of Agricultural Research >Tillage and rice-wheat cropping systems influences on soil physical properties: Water balance and wheat yield under irrigated conditions
【24h】

Tillage and rice-wheat cropping systems influences on soil physical properties: Water balance and wheat yield under irrigated conditions

机译:耕作和稻麦种植系统对土壤物理特性的影响:灌溉条件下的水分平衡和小麦产量

获取原文
           

摘要

Challenge of increasing food production in the next 20 years to match population growth is daunting and warrants improvement in the quality of natural resources for growing more food from marginal and degraded lands.Adopting a better tillage system does not only improve the soil health and crop productivity but also improves the environment. A field experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of tillage and irrigation management on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in a post-rice (Oryza sativa L.) management system on sandy loam soil for 2009 to 2010 and 2011 to 2012. Four irrigation levels (I1:irrigation at crown root initiation (CRI); I2:irrigation at CRI+jointing; I3:irrigation at CRI+ jointing+ flowering; I4:irrigation at CRI+ jointing+flowering+dough) stages and three tillage systems (ZT: zero tillage;BPW:bed planted wheat and CT:conventional tillage) were tested. Zero tillage compared to CT, resulted in higher bulk density (1.60 vs 1.49 Mg·m-3), lower total porosity (49.3 vs 53.7%), higher penetration resistance (1.50 vs 1.24 MPa), and lower steady state infiltration rate (0.18 vs 0.38 mm·h-1)? in the surface 0 to 15 cm soil layer.Irrigation levels significantly affected crop water use, wheat yield, and water use efficiency (WUE). Aggregates<25 mm ZT was significantly higher (4.4%), than CT and BPW methods (3.2 and 3.4%, respectively. Grain yield declined by 20.5, 11.7 and 7.7% of I4 (4.57 Mg·ha-1) with I1,I2 and I3 treatments. Average values of WUE were 17.40, 15.97 kg·ha-1·mm-1and 14.88 m3·kg-1grain for the BPW, ZT and CT treatments and water storage efficiency were 21.9, 24.5 and 29.2%, for CT, ZT and BPW, respectively.
机译:未来20年要增加粮食产量以适应人口增长的挑战是艰巨的,需要改善自然资源的质量,以便从边缘和退化的土地上种植更多的粮食。采用更好的耕作制度不仅可以改善土壤健康和作物生产力同时也改善了环境。进行了田间试验,研究了2009年至2010年以及2011年至2012年在稻壤土上的稻田管理系统中耕种和灌溉管理对小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)生产的影响。4灌溉水平(I1:冠根起始灌溉(CRI); I2:CRI +接缝灌溉; I3:CRI +接缝+开花灌溉)I4:CRI +接缝+开花+生面团灌溉)阶段和三个耕作制度(ZT:零耕作; BPW:种植小麦; CT:常规耕作)。与CT相比,零耕作可使堆密度更高(1.60对1.49 Mg·m-3),更低的总孔隙率(49.3对53.7%),更高的抗穿透性(1.50对1.24 MPa)和更低的稳态渗透率(0.18) vs 0.38 mm·h-1)?在0至15厘米的土壤表层。灌溉水平显着影响作物的水分利用,小麦产量和水分利用效率(WUE)。 ZT <25 mm的骨料显着高于CT和BPW方法(分别为3.2和3.4%)(4.4%),I1,I2的I4(4.57 Mg·ha-1)的谷物产量分别下降了20.5%,11.7%和7.7%。 BPW,ZT和CT处理的WUE平均值分别为17.40、15.97 kg·ha-1·mm-1和14.88 m3·kg-1谷物,CT的WUE值为21.9%,24.5%和29.2%。 ZT和BPW。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号