首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Statistical Climatology, Meteorology and Oceanography >Estimating trends in the global mean temperature record
【24h】

Estimating trends in the global mean temperature record

机译:估算全球平均温度记录的趋势

获取原文
           

摘要

Given uncertainties in physical theory and numerical climate simulations, the historical temperature record is often used as a source of empirical information about climate change. Many historical trend analyses appear to de-emphasize physical and statistical assumptions: examples include regression models that treat time rather than radiative forcing as the relevant covariate, and time series methods that account for internal variability in nonparametric rather than parametric ways. However, given a limited data record and the presence of internal variability, estimating radiatively forced temperature trends in the historical record necessarily requires some assumptions. Ostensibly empirical methods can also involve an inherent conflict in assumptions: they require data records that are short enough for naive trend models to be applicable, but long enough for long-timescale internal variability to be accounted for. In the context of global mean temperatures, empirical methods that appear to de-emphasize assumptions can therefore produce misleading inferences, because the trend over the twentieth century is complex and the scale of temporal correlation is long relative to the length of the data record. We illustrate here how a simple but physically motivated trend model can provide better-fitting and more broadly applicable trend estimates and can allow for a wider array of questions to be addressed. In particular, the model allows one to distinguish, within a single statistical framework, between uncertainties in the shorter-term vs. longer-term response to radiative forcing, with implications not only on historical trends but also on uncertainties in future projections. We also investigate the consequence on inferred uncertainties of the choice of a statistical description of internal variability. While nonparametric methods may seem to avoid making explicit assumptions, we demonstrate how even misspecified parametric statistical methods, if attuned to the important characteristics of internal variability, can result in more accurate uncertainty statements about trends.
机译:考虑到物理理论和数值气候模拟的不确定性,历史温度记录通常被用作有关气候变化的经验信息的来源。许多历史趋势分析似乎都不再强调物理和统计假设:示例包括将时间而非辐射强迫视为相关协变量的回归模型,以及以非参数而非参数方式说明内部可变性的时间序列方法。但是,鉴于有限的数据记录和内部变化的存在,估计历史记录中的辐射强迫温度趋势必然需要一些假设。表面上的经验方法还可能涉及假设中的固有冲突:它们需要足够短的数据记录才能适用于幼稚的趋势模型,但又需要足够长的时间来考虑长期的内部变化。在全球平均温度的背景下,似乎无法强调假设的经验方法可能会产生误导性的推论,因为二十世纪的趋势很复杂,时间相关性的规模相对于数据记录的长度而言很长。在这里,我们说明了一个简单但具有实际动机的趋势模型如何能够提供更好的拟合性和更广泛的适用性趋势估计,并可以解决更多的问题。尤其是,该模型允许人们在单个统计框架内区分对辐射强迫的短期和长期响应的不确定性,不仅影响历史趋势,而且还影响未来预测的不确定性。我们还调查了内部变异性的统计描述选择的推断不确定性的结果。尽管非参数方法似乎可以避免做出明确的假设,但我们证明,即使误指定了参数的统计方法,如果与内部可变性的重要特征相协调,也会如何导致关于趋势的更准确的不确定性陈述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号