...
首页> 外文期刊>Aerosol and Air Quality Research >Aerosol Chamber Characterization for Commercial Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor Evaluation
【24h】

Aerosol Chamber Characterization for Commercial Particulate Matter (PM) Sensor Evaluation

机译:用于商业颗粒物(PM)传感器评估的气溶胶腔室表征

获取原文

摘要

The negative impact of PM_(2.5) exposure has encouraged the development of scattering-based PM sensors for monitoring the PM level spatially and temporally. These PM sensors excel in terms of cost, operating power, and compactness, but the performance of each model needs to be evaluated individually. The evaluation of a PM sensor can be conducted inside an aerosol chamber by measuring the PM concentration in time series using both the sensor and reference monitors. However, earlier experimental processes were time-consuming, as a long time was needed to decrease the PM concentration by loss mechanisms. We designed an aerosol chamber by introducing an output airflow rate to decay the PM concentration more quickly. The characterization of the chamber yielded an empirical equation to describe the PM concentration decay profile, which can be used to predict the measurement time and the number of data points. The chamber was then utilized to evaluate three PM sensors (Sharp GP2Y1010AU0F, Winsen ZH03A, and Novafitness SDS011). A condensation particle counter (TSI, 3025A) and particle sensor (Honeywell, HPMA115S0-XXX) were employed as reference monitors. The evaluation determined the linearity, calibration curve, and precision of the PM sensors. The evaluated models showed excellent linearity, with R~(2) values above 0.956. The least square and RMA correlation of the evaluated PM sensors demonstrated the best linearity achieved at a low PM measurement range (0–400 μg m~(–3)). As the Winsen ZH03A and Novafitness SDS011 sensors had coefficients of variation below 10%, both of the sensors have an acceptable precision according to the EPA standard.
机译:PM_(2.5)暴露的负面影响鼓励了基于散射的PM传感器的发展,该传感器可在空间和时间上监测PM水平。这些PM传感器在成本,运行功率和紧凑性方面均表现出色,但是每种型号的性能需要单独评估。可以通过在气溶胶室内对PM传感器进行评估,方法是同时使用传感器和参考监视器测量PM浓度。但是,较早的实验过程很耗时,因为需要较长的时间才能通过损失机理降低PM浓度。我们通过引入输出气流速率来设计雾化室,以更快地衰减PM浓度。腔室的特征产生了一个经验公式来描述PM浓度衰减曲线,可用于预测测量时间和数据点的数量。然后,该腔室用于评估三个PM传感器(Sharp GP2Y1010AU0F,Winsen ZH03A和Novafitness SDS011)。冷凝粒子计数器(TSI,3025A)和粒子传感器(Honeywell,HPMA115S0-XXX)用作参考监控器。评估确定了PM传感器的线性,校准曲线和精度。评估模型显示出极好的线性,R〜(2)值高于0.956。所评估的PM传感器的最小二乘和RMA相关性表明,在较低的PM测量范围(0–400μgm〜(–3))下可获得最佳线性。由于Winsen ZH03A和Novafitness SDS011传感器的变异系数低于10%,因此根据EPA标准,这两种传感器均具有可接受的精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号