首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Sciences and Humanities >The Existence of Same-Sex Marriage in the Perspective of Human Right and Legal in Indonesia
【24h】

The Existence of Same-Sex Marriage in the Perspective of Human Right and Legal in Indonesia

机译:印度尼西亚人权与法律视野中的同性婚姻的存在

获取原文
       

摘要

Marriage Problems in Indonesia before The issuance of Act No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage as a State law was regulated in the customary law of each customary law community. Regarding the terms and validity of the marriage submitted to their respective religious law. Therefore, whether such marriage is permitted or not is determined by the laws of each religion. After the issuance of Act No. 1 of 1974, same-sex marriage has not been regulated, but their existence as citizens is not differentiated from other citizens, such as the right to life, the right to work, the right to use the right on politic, the right on education, the right on economy. Therefore the research problem that needs to be studied is how the marriage is seen from the perspective of Human Rights and from the perspective of State Law? The research method used is in the form of normative legal research and empirical legal research with statute approaches, analytical approaches, case approaches, and legal anthropology approaches. Data is then analyzed using hermeneutic and qualitative techniques. Marriage in customary law and state law can only be done between men and women in Balinese customary law are known as purusa and predana, with the main goal of continuing a generation which according to Balinese customary law is called suputra. Marriage is having the aspect of religious, sociological, and juridical. While the tendency shows, same-sex marriage is done by falsifying documents of self-identity so that it is against the state law and customary law which include religious laws. Therefore, those who are only interested in the same sex must make gender choices as part of human rights when they are married to a single status as a male and the other party has the status of a woman who can be legally represented by various documents, as well as sociologically reflected as husband and wife and can be accepted in the community where they are resided.
机译:印度尼西亚之前的婚姻问题1974年第1号法(关于婚姻作为国家法律)的颁布在每个习惯法共同体的习惯法中都有规定。关于婚姻的条款和有效性,要遵守各自的宗教法。因此,是否允许这种婚姻取决于每种宗教的法律。在1974年第1号法令颁布之后,同性婚姻尚未得到规范,但是其作为公民的存在与其他公民没有区别,例如生命权,工作权,使用权。政治,教育权,经济权。因此,需要研究的研究问题是如何从人权和国家法的角度看待婚姻?所采用的研究方法为规范性法律研究和实证性法律研究,包括成文法,分析法,案例法和法律人类学法。然后使用解释和定性技术分析数据。习惯法和州法之间的婚姻只能在男性和女性之间达成,在习惯法中被称为purusa和predana,其主要目标是延续一代人,根据巴厘岛习惯法被称为超世代。婚姻具有宗教,社会学和司法方面。尽管这种趋势表明,同性婚姻是通过伪造自我身份证明文件来进行的,因此违反了包括宗教法在内的州法律和习惯法。因此,那些只对同性感兴趣的人,在结婚时必须选择性别作为人权的一部分,作为男性,而另一方具有可以由各种文件合法代表的女性的身份,以及在社会上体现为夫妻的身份,可以在他们所居住的社区接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号