...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Petroleum Exploration and Development >Analyses of Fluids Used in Gravel Pack Placement in Sand Control Operations
【24h】

Analyses of Fluids Used in Gravel Pack Placement in Sand Control Operations

机译:防砂作业中砾石堆放中使用的流体分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Gravel pack fluids for proppant transport in sand control operations have been analyzed. The two fluids considered have been Xanthan and HEC. Laboratory experiment was conducted on the two fluids to determine their capabilities as carrier fluids. 30Lbs/Mgal and 40Lbs/Mgal of both fluids were considered using Trigonox A-W70 as breaker fluid. The result shows that Xanthan withstood more of the breaker fluid than HEC in terms of sand settling and breaker time. HEC broke at lesser time than Xanthan making Xanthan more capable to hold proppant at downhole conditions while transporting to target depth. The combined analyses of the breaking time, the sand settling capability, the plastic viscosity and pH makes Xanthan more preferable as a gravel pack fluid than Xanthan. However, HEC shows more ease of release of proppant once target depth is reached. Effect of proppant release and cost of proppant supports the choice of HEC as a gravel pack fluids. For optimized operation the combined use of HEC and Xanthan is recommended at calculated depth and downhole condition.
机译:分析了用于防砂作业中支撑剂运输的砾石充填液。所考虑的两种流体是黄原胶和HEC。对这两种流体进行了实验室实验,以确定它们作为载液的能力。使用Trigonox A-W70作为破乳剂,认为两种液体分别为30Lbs / Mgal和40Lbs / Mgal。结果表明,就沙粒沉降和破碎时间而言,黄原胶比HEC承受的破碎液更多。与黄原胶相比,HEC的破裂时间更短,这使得黄原胶更有能力将支撑剂保持在井下条件下,同时输送至目标深度。对破裂时间,砂子沉降能力,塑性粘度和pH值的综合分析使黄原胶作为砾石充填液比黄原胶更可取。但是,一旦达到目标深度,HEC会更容易释放支撑剂。支撑剂释放的影响和支撑剂成本支持选择HEC作为砾石充填液。为了优化操作,建议在计算的深度和井下条件下结合使用HEC和黄原胶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号