首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Journalism and Communication >Interplay of National Interest and Ideologies with Global Frame of War on Terror: Coverage of Tiananmen Attack in Chinese, Thai, and US Newspapers
【24h】

Interplay of National Interest and Ideologies with Global Frame of War on Terror: Coverage of Tiananmen Attack in Chinese, Thai, and US Newspapers

机译:国家利益和意识形态与全球反恐战争的相互作用:中国,泰国和美国报纸对天安门袭击的报道

获取原文
       

摘要

Chinese, Thai, and US media reports about the 10-28 Tiananmen attack were used as data to study news frames and understand how frames are constructed nationally, regionally, and globally. How these frames are borrowed and used for the sake of gaining approval and how global “war on terror” frame is used without much criticism. Study used one-week news reports about the 10-28 Tiananmen attack in 2013 from Asia News Monitor, China Daily, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal for analysis. It was found that national interest and ideologies play an important part in frame construction while globalized frames are employed to gain approval from rest of the world and become part of “us” and outcast “them”. US newspapers use analogies completely irrelevant to attack and try to use this even as a reminder for reader that Tiananmen square is historically famous for pro-democracy protests. Chinese newspapers do not employ global “war on terror”: frame to portray the 10-28 attack and avoid connecting it to global terrorism.
机译:中国,泰国和美国媒体就10-28天安门袭击事件的报道被用作研究新闻框架并了解如何在全国,区域和全球范围内构建新闻框架的数据。如何借用和使用这些框架来获得批准,以及如何使用全球性的“反恐战争”框架而无需多加批评。该研究使用了《亚洲新闻监测》,《中国日报》,《纽约时报》和《华尔街日报》关于2013年天安门事件10-28的一周新闻报道进行分析。人们发现,国家利益和意识形态在框架建设中起着重要的作用,而全球化框架则被用来获得世界其他地区的认可,并成为“我们”和被抛弃的“他们”的一部分。美国报纸使用与袭击完全无关的类比,甚至试图提醒读者,天安门广场在历史上以民主抗议而闻名。中国报纸没有采用全球性的“反恐战争”:描绘10-28袭击并避免将其与全球恐怖主义联系起来的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号