首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Anthropology >Could Wading in Shallow Water Account for the Unique Shape of the Australopithecus afarensis Pelvis?
【24h】

Could Wading in Shallow Water Account for the Unique Shape of the Australopithecus afarensis Pelvis?

机译:在浅水中涉水是否可以解释澳大利亚南方猿骨盆的独特形状?

获取原文
           

摘要

A 3D Geometric Morphometric (GM) analysis of the shape of the pelvis and femur of various extinct hominids and extant humans and apes is described. Observed differences in shape are then discussed in the context of the wading hypothesis, a model of the evolution of hominin bipedalism that has rarely been seriously considered despite some compelling style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:;" "=""> style="font-family:Verdana;">arguments in its favour. The general shape of the pelvis of style="font-family:Verdana;">Australopithecus afarensis style="font-family:Verdana;"> is confirmed to be fundamentally different from both Homo and extant great apes, and not intermediate between them. style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">Although it includes some human-like traits indicating a strong propensity to bipedalism, there are also sufficient differences to indicate that australopithecines probably exhibited a different type of bipedality to the relatively efficient striding gait associated with modern humans. An analysis of putative muscle lever arm ratios is described, which generated over 135,000 ratios in all. This data was then explored using the Pivot Table feature of Microsoft Excel. Succinct species summaries of broad lever arm groups, such as those pertaining to abduction compared to those pertaining to extension were generated. The results indicate that the australopithecine hip was more adapted, than modern humans or extant great apes, to adduction, abduction and rotation of the thigh during locomotion. It is argued that this apparent lateral biomechanical advantage complements the broad platypelloid shape as a putative adaptation to side-to-side wading. style="font-family:Verdana;"> style="font-family:Verdana;">This adds further evidential weight to the wading hypothesis of bipedal origins in addition to the already compelling arguments from extant ape behaviour in shallow water and the favourable evidence of the paleohabitats of the earliest bipeds.
机译:描述了对各种已灭绝的原始人以及现存的人类和猿类的骨盆和股骨的形状的3D几何形态计量(GM)分析。然后,在涉水假说的背景下讨论观察到的形状差异,涉水假说是人称两足动物进化模型,尽管有一些引人注目的 style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> < span style =“ font-family :;” “ =”“> style =” font-family:Verdana;“>赞成。 style =” font-family:Verdana;“>经证实,南方古猿afarensis style =“ font-family:Verdana;”>与人猿和现存的大猿人根本不同,并且不在两者之间。 style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> style =“ font-family:Verdana;”>尽管它包含一些类似于人的特征,表明强烈倾向于两足动物,但也有足够的能力差异表明,澳大利亚古猿可能会表现出与现代人相对有效的步态步态不同的两足动物类型,描述了推定的肌肉杠杆臂比率的分析,该比率产生了总共135,000个比率,然后使用数据透视法进行了研究。 Microsoft Excel的表格功能,广义杠杆臂类别的简洁物种摘要,例如与绑架相比那些与扩展有关的。结果表明,与现代人或现存的大猿类相比,南澳大利亚州的optheopthecine髋部在运动过程中更适应大腿的内收,外展和旋转。有人认为,这种明显的侧向生物力学优势补充了宽阔的类蝶形形状,是对侧向涉水的公认适应。 style =“ font-family:Verdana;”> 风格=“ font-family:Verdana;”>除了在浅水区中现存的猿猴行为引起的令人信服的论点以及最早的两足动物的古栖息地的证据外,这进一步增加了涉足两足动物起源的假说。跨度>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号