首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Economics and Business >The High Levels of Excess Reserves 2008-2012: An Investigation into the Determinants of the U.S. Banks' Liquidity Hoarding during the Global Financial Crisis
【24h】

The High Levels of Excess Reserves 2008-2012: An Investigation into the Determinants of the U.S. Banks' Liquidity Hoarding during the Global Financial Crisis

机译:2008-2012年高额超额准备金:全球金融危机期间美国银行流动性ity积的决定因素调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Excess reserves, the indication of a bank's opportunity to invest, have historically been quite predictable and low for many years. From early sixties to August of 2008, the percentage of excess reserves in relation to required reserves has been between 1% to 9%. In September 2008, shortly prior to the tipping point of the 2008 financial crisis, the level of excess reserves began to rise dramatically and has stayed quite high even four years later. The watershed moment of Lehman Brothers and AIG failing precipitated a banking panic that involved drastic policy changes by the Fed and financial firms scrambling to find liquidity in anticipation of a credit crunch and drawdowns of credit lines. In less than six months, excess reserves ballooned to over $900 billion, which accounts to 2,063% of required reserves. Surprisingly, the large amount of excess reserves did not return to the previous levels. Instead, it has increased even more to nearly $2 trillion. This paper thus investigates the determinants for banks to hoard liquidity. The data reveals that high losses in loans and investments have caused banks to prognosticate higher levels of precautionary reserves. Furthermore, the very low federal funds rate and high unemployment rate have given banks limited opportunities to use the reserves in other alternative investment vehicles. Finally, the Federal Reserve's decision to pay interest on excess reserves provided incentives for banks and made holding reserves above the required amount no longer a cost for the bank.
机译:从历史上讲,超额准备金是银行可预测的机会,多年来一直是可预见的,而且很少。从六十年代初到2008年8月,超额准备金相对于所需准备金的百分比一直在1%至9%之间。 2008年9月,就在2008年金融危机的临界点之前,超额准备金水平开始急剧上升,甚至在四年后仍保持很高水平。雷曼兄弟(Lehman Brothers)和美国国际集团(AIG)失败的分水岭时刻引发了银行恐慌,涉及美联储(Fed)剧烈的政策变化,金融公司争先恐后地寻找信贷紧缩和信贷额度下降,从而寻求流动性。在不到六个月的时间里,超额准备金激增至超过9000亿美元,占所需准备金的2063%。令人惊讶的是,大量的超额准备金没有恢复到以前的水平。相反,它增加了将近2万亿美元。因此,本文研究了银行ho积流动性的决定因素。数据显示,高额的贷款和投资损失已导致银行预测更高的防范准备金水平。此外,联邦基金利率非常低而失业率很高,这给银行使用其他准备金投资工具的机会有限。最后,美联储决定对超额准备金支付利息,这为银行提供了激励,并使超过规定数额的持有准备金不再对银行造成成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号