首页> 外文期刊>Acta Mechanica et Automatica >Cross-Correlation-Based Method vs. Classical Fft for Spectral Analysis of Impulse Response
【24h】

Cross-Correlation-Based Method vs. Classical Fft for Spectral Analysis of Impulse Response

机译:基于互相关的方法与经典Fft的脉冲响应频谱分析

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The paper presents comparison of results of impulse response spectral analysis that has been obtained using a method based on cross-correlation with results obtained using classical FFT. The presented non-Fourier method is achieved by correlating the analyzed signal and reference single-harmonic signals and using Hilbert transform to obtain an envelope of cross-correlation. The envelope of crosscorrelation makes it possible to calculate appropriate indicator and make its plot in frequency domain as a spectrum. The spectrum obtained this way has its advantage over the FFT that the spectral resolution does not depend on duration of signal. At the same time, the spectral resolution can be much greater than spectral resolution resultant from FFT. Obtained results show that presented non-Fourier method gives frequency readout more accurate in comparison to FFT when the impulse response is a short-time signal e.g. few dozen of miliseconds lasting.
机译:本文介绍了使用基于互相关的方法获得的脉冲响应频谱分析结果与使用经典FFT获得的结果的比较。提出的非傅立叶方法是通过将分析信号与参考单谐波信号相关并使用希尔伯特变换获得互相关包络来实现的。互相关的包络使得可以计算适当的指标并将其在频域中的频谱绘制为频谱。通过这种方式获得的频谱具有优于FFT的优势,即频谱分辨率不取决于信号的持续时间。同时,频谱分辨率可能远大于FFT产生的频谱分辨率。所得结果表明,当脉冲响应是短时信号(例如,脉冲信号)时,与FFT相比,所提出的非傅立叶方法可使频率读数更准确。持续数十毫秒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号