首页> 外文期刊>Acta Geologica Slovaca >R?zne sp?soby hodnotenia úspe?nosti máp zosuvného hazardu: bivaria?ny verzus multivaria?ny ?tatisticky model
【24h】

R?zne sp?soby hodnotenia úspe?nosti máp zosuvného hazardu: bivaria?ny verzus multivaria?ny ?tatisticky model

机译:评估滑坡赌博图成功的不同方法:双变量与多变量统计模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Systematic studies of geological hazard and risks were generated by interest from insurance companies during the 20th century. The first studies were linked to individual building structures and later also to landuse and environmental impact assessment. Data collected were transformed to maps of seismic zonation and landslide hazard maps. The paper is devoted to landslide hazard map quantification and verification. The landslide hazard assessment is based on the assumption that landslides will occur in the future under the same conditions as occurred in the past. In the model area of the Myjava Upland (Western Slovakia) statistical methods - bivariate statistical analysis and conditional multivariate analysis were applied to assess the landslide hazard. The necessity to evaluate the informative value of final maps has arisen recently; practically it means to verify them. In the 80-ties, when the first landslide susceptibility maps were created, they were verified by visual comparison of the prognostic maps with a map of registered slope deformations. Here in, methods of statistical accuracy and ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves are used for evaluation of both statistical models. 285,004 pixels selected from raster of registered landslides were evaluated and an equal number of pixels randomly selected from raster of landslide hazard map prepared using bivariate statistical analysis? in the case of conditional multivariate analysis, there were 285,030 pixels. The results illustrate that, according to most of the methods of statistical success used to set model performance, both prognostic maps correspond to quality configured statistical models. This comparison shows that the difference between the accuracy of these two approaches has a value of about 5% in favour of multivariate statistical analysis. The difference between the statistical methods represents less than two percent using ROC curves for model verification.
机译:在20世纪,保险公司的兴趣引起了对地质灾害和风险的系统研究。最初的研究与单个建筑结构相关,后来与土地利用和环境影响评估相关。收集的数据被转换为地震分区图和滑坡灾害图。本文致力于滑坡灾害图的量化和验证。滑坡灾害评估基于这样的假设,即未来滑坡将在与过去相同的条件下发生。在Myjava高地(西斯洛伐克)的模型区域中,采用了双变量统计分析和条件多变量分析来评估滑坡灾害。最近出现了评估最终地图信息价值的必要性。实际上,这意味着要对其进行验证。在80年代,创建了第一个滑坡敏感性图时,通过视觉比较预后图和已记录的边坡变形图来对其进行验证。在此,统计准确性和ROC(接收器工作特性)曲线的方法用于两种统计模型的评估。评估了从注册滑坡的栅格中选择的285,004个像素,并使用双变量统计分析从滑坡灾害图的栅格中随机选择了相等数量的像素?在条件多元分析的情况下,有285,030像素。结果表明,根据用于设置模型性能的大多数统计成功方法,两个预后图都对应于质量配置的统计模型。这种比较表明,这两种方法的准确性之间的差异约为5%,有利于进行多元统计分析。使用ROC曲线进行模型验证时,统计方法之间的差异表示不足2%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号