首页> 外文期刊>Acta Geologica Slovaca >Stanovenie koeficientu drsnosti puklín JRC metódou blízkej digitálnej fotogrametrie
【24h】

Stanovenie koeficientu drsnosti puklín JRC metódou blízkej digitálnej fotogrametrie

机译:紧密数字摄影法测定JRC裂纹粗糙度系数

获取原文
       

摘要

This work deals with the evaluation of joint roughness coefficient (JRC) in the rock mass based on the digital photogrammetry and its comparison with traditional method of JRC estimation using linear profiling. The JRC value is used for the estimation of shear strength of discontinuities in rock mass. First method used for JRC determination was the method using comb profilometer used to create roughness profiles by tracing the cross-sections to the paper and digitizing them. The second method made use of principles of digital photogrammetry, where digital images were used for the creation of 3D model of joint surface, from which roughness profiles were extracted. Both methods were used at the Devínska cesta road cut in Bratislava. The profiles obtained by two methods were compared visually with the standard profiles. Based on this comparison each profile was given a JRC value which is necessary input for the estimation of joint shear strength. The value of JRC obtained by both methods was in range 14–16 corresponding to the standard profile no. 8. Further, both methods, contact and non-contact, were compared by subtracting both curves and statistically analyzing the difference in more than 1500 sampling points. The results showed that the standard deviation in the case of profile 16–17 was 0.422 mm, which represents 4.4 % of the roughness amplitude, while for the profile 22–23 the standard deviation was 0.35 mm, representing 3.5 % of the roughness amplitude. Both standard deviations were under the 5 % margin, which gives good indication of the acceptability of photogrammetric method of JRC determination.
机译:这项工作基于数字摄影测量法对岩体中的节理粗糙度系数(JRC)进行评估,并将其与使用线性轮廓分析的传统JRC估计方法进行比较。 JRC值用于估算岩体中不连续部分的抗剪强度。用于JRC测定的第一种方法是使用梳型轮廓仪的方法,该仪通过将横截面描画到纸上并将其数字化来创建粗糙度轮廓。第二种方法利用数字摄影测量原理,其中数字图像用于创建关节表面的3D模型,并从中提取粗糙度轮廓。两种方法都在布拉迪斯拉发的Devínskacesta道路切割中使用。将通过两种方法获得的轮廓与标准轮廓进行目测比较。基于此比较,为每个轮廓提供了JRC值,这是估算接点抗剪强度的必要输入。两种方法获得的JRC值在14至16的范围内,对应于标准曲线No。 8.此外,通过减去两条曲线并统计分析超过1500个采样点的差异,比较了接触和非接触两种方法。结果表明,轮廓16–17的标准偏差为0.422 mm,占粗糙度幅度的4.4%,而轮廓22–23的标准偏差为0.35 mm,占粗糙度幅度的3.5%。两种标准偏差均在5%的范围内,这很好地表明了JRC测定的摄影测量方法的可接受性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号