...
首页> 外文期刊>A List Apart >Every Time You Call a Proprietary Feature “CSS3,” a Kitten Dies
【24h】

Every Time You Call a Proprietary Feature “CSS3,” a Kitten Dies

机译:每次您将专有功能称为“ CSS3”时,小猫都会死亡

获取原文
           

摘要

Any -webkit- feature that doesn’t exist in a specification (not even an Editor’s draft) is not CSS3. Yes, they are commonly evangelized as such, but they are not part of CSS at all. This distinction is not nitpicking. It’s important because it encourages certain vendors to circumvent the standards process, implement whatever they come up with in WebKit, then evangelize it to developers as the best thing since sliced bread. In our eagerness to use the new bling, we often forget how many people fought in the past decade to enable us to write code without forks and hacks and expect it to work interoperably. Lea Verou explains why single-vendor solutions are not the same as standards and not healthy for your professional practice or the future of the web.
机译:规范中不存在的任何-webkit-功能(甚至不是编辑者的草稿)都不是CSS3。是的,它们通常是这样传播的,但是它们根本不是CSS的一部分。这种区别不是挑剔的。这很重要,因为它鼓励某些供应商规避标准流程,实施他们在WebKit中提出的所有内容,然后将其推广给开发人员,这是切成薄片以来最好的事情。在渴望使用新功能的过程中,我们经常忘记过去十年中有多少人为使我们能够编写代码而没有分叉和砍伐,并希望它能够互操作地进行了奋斗。 Lea Verou解释了为什么单供应商解决方案与标准不同,并且对于您的专业实践或网络的未来而言不健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号