...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Improving Design of a Cryogenic Process byExergy and Process Economic Analyses
【24h】

Improving Design of a Cryogenic Process byExergy and Process Economic Analyses

机译:用能值和工艺经济分析改进低温工艺的设计。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: This work compared four different designs of a cryogenic process (Linde methane liquefaction) using exergy and process economic analyses.Study Design: Simulation, energy, exergy and process economic analyses were used.Place and Duration of Study: Department of Chemical Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University Ile-Ife and the duration of study was between March and May 2011.Methodology: Hyprotech System Simulator (HYSYS) software was used in simulating the process plants and Microsoft Excel was used for exergy, energy and process economic analyses. Annual venture profit was used as economic index in the selection of best design among the available alternatives.Result: Linde Methane Liquefaction for cryogenic process was investigated for improvement using exergy and process economic analyses. Four design cases were considered. The exergy efficiency for the base case (case 1) was 5.19%, 5.30% for case 2 when a recycle was added to the base case, 28.7% for case 3 when a recycle and a turbine were added to the base case and 39.5% for case 4 when a recycle was added and the valve was replaced with a turbine in the base case. Case 3 has the highest equipment and installation cost of $594649.14. The capital investment, operating and maintenance expenses were $88574.00/yr, $89687.30/yr, $94280.17/yr and $90672.23/yr for case 1, case 2, case 3 and case 4, respectively. Process economic analysis based on 1 kg/h throughput revealed case 2 with the highest annual venture profit of $4564265.09/yr as the best design.Conclusion: Since it is known that throughput has effect on venture profit, it was concluded that case 4 with the highest exergetic efficiency could be the best design at higher throughput. This will be investigated in a follow up study.
机译:目的:这项工作使用火用和过程经济分析比较了低温工艺(林德甲烷液化)的四种不同设计研究设计:模拟,能源,火用和过程经济分析研究地点和持续时间:化学工程系研究时间为2011年3月至2011年5月。方法:使用Hyprotech System Simulator(HYSYS)软件模拟过程工厂,使用Microsoft Excel进行火用,能源和过程经济分析。结果:在利用低温和过程经济分析的基础上,研究了林德甲烷液化技术在低温工艺中的应用,以改进其低温工艺。考虑了四个设计案例。基本案例(案例1)的火用效率为5.19%,案例2当添加再循环到基本案例时为5.30%,案例3为案例3,当将再循环和涡轮添加到基本案例时为28.7%,39.5%对于案例4,在基础案例中增加了再循环并用涡轮机代替了阀门。案例3的设备和安装成本最高,为594649.14美元。案例1,案例2,案例3和案例4的资本投资,运营和维护费用分别为$ 88574.00 /年,$ 89687.30 /年,$ 94280.17 /年和$ 90672.23 /年。基于1 kg / h吞吐量的过程经济分析表明,案例2的年度最佳风险利润为4564265.09美元/年,这是最佳设计。结论:由于已知吞吐量会影响风险利润,因此得出结论,案例4的风险利润最高。最高的运动效率可能是更高吞吐量下的最佳设计。将在后续研究中对此进行调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号