首页> 外文期刊>Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Techniques on Energy Dynamics and Profitability of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) - Rice Cropping Sequence in Irrigated Ecosystem of C. G. Plains
【24h】

Effect of Tillage and Weed Control Techniques on Energy Dynamics and Profitability of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) - Rice Cropping Sequence in Irrigated Ecosystem of C. G. Plains

机译:耕作和杂草防治技术对C.G. Plains灌溉系统中鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L。)-稻作序列的能量动力学和获利能力的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

A field study was conducted during rabi seasons of 2010-11 and 2011-12 at the Research cum Instructional Farm of Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh to evaluate the effect of various tillage and weed management techniques on energy dynamics and profitability of chickpea-rice cropping sequence in irrigated ecosystem of C.G. plains. The results indicate that plots were divided into main and sub plots (tillage and weed management practices). Three tillage practices viz ., conventional tillage (T_(1)),? minimum tillage (T_(2)) and zero tillage (T_(3)) in main plot and nine weed management practices as pendimethalin @ 1000 g ha~(-1) PE (W_(1)), imazethapyr @ 80 g ha~(-1) PE (W_(2)), imazethapyr @ 90 g ha~(-1) PE (W_(3)), imazethapyr @ 100 g ha~(-1) PE (W_(4)) at 2 DAS, imazethapyr @ 70 g ha~(-1) POE (W_(5)), imazethapyr @ 80 g ha~(-1) POE (W_(6)), imazethapyr @ 90 g ha~(-1) POE (W_(7)) at 20 DAS, one hand weeding at 20 DAS (W_(8)) and weedy check (W_(9)), in sub plots. Among the various tillage practices, maximum energy use efficiency 3.74 q MJ~(-1) × 10~(-3) ha~(-1) and energy productivity 160.34 kg MJ~(-1) ha~(-1) were obtained with conventional tillage (T_(1)) followed by minimum tillage (T_(2)) and zero tillage (T_(3)) and among the different weed control methods, maximum energy use efficiency 5.46 q MJ~(-1) × 10~(-3) ha~(-1) and energy productivity 233.37 kg MJ~(-1) ha~(-1) were found with one hand weeding at 20 DAS (W_(8)) followed by post-emergence application of imazethapyr @ 90 g ha~(-1 )(W_(7)) followed by imazethapyr @ 80 g ha~(-1 )PoE (W_(6)). The economic production of experiment in terms of net return was maximum under (T_(1)) conventional tillage Rs.19824.21 ha~(-1) with B:C ratio 1.19 and (W_(8)) one hand weeding at 20 DAS Rs.19171.44 ha~(-1) with B:C ratio 0.95 and this was followed by @ 90 g ha~(-1 )imazethapyr, where net return Rs.19086.74 ha~(-1) and B:C ratio 1.04. The minimum net return and B:C ratio was observed under zero tillage (T_(3)) and weedy check (W_(9)).
机译:在Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya,Raipur,Chhattisgarh的研究暨教学农场的狂犬病季节中,在2010-11和2011-12的狂犬病季节进行了田野研究,以评估各种耕作和杂草处理技术对鹰嘴豆能量动力学和获利能力的影响。 CG灌溉生态系统中的水稻种植序列平原。结果表明,该地块分为主要和次要地块(耕作和杂草管理实践)。三种耕作方法,即传统耕作(T_(1)),?主要地块的最小耕作(T_(2))和零耕种(T_(3))以及九种杂草处理措施,如戊二甲灵@ 1000 g ha〜(-1)PE(W_(1)),咪唑乙烟@ 80 g ha〜 (-1)PE(W_(2)),咪唑乙yr @ 90 g ha〜(-1)PE(W_(3)),咪唑乙yr @ 100 g ha〜(-1)PE(W_(4))在2 DAS ,咪唑乙烟碱@ 70 g ha〜(-1)POE(W_(5)),咪唑乙烟碱@ 80 g ha〜(-1)POE(W_(6)),咪唑乙烟碱@ 90 g ha〜(-1)POE(W_ (7))在20 DAS下,在子图中以20 DAS(W_(8))和杂草检查(W_(9))进行一只手除草。在各种耕作方式中,最大能量利用效率为3.74 q MJ〜(-1)×10〜(-3)ha〜(-1),能量生产率为160.34 kg MJ〜(-1)ha〜(-1)在常规耕作(T_(1))之后是最小耕作(T_(2))和零耕种(T_(3)),在不同的杂草控制方法中,最大能量利用效率为5.46 q MJ〜(-1)×10在20 DAS(W_(8))上除草一次,然后出苗后施用约(-3)ha〜(-1)和能量生产力,发现233.37 kg MJ〜(-1)ha〜(-1)。咪唑乙哌啶@ 90 g ha〜(-1)(W_(7)),然后咪唑乙哌啶@ 80 g ha〜(-1)PoE(W_(6))。在(T_(1))常规耕作Rs.19824.21 ha〜(-1),B:C比1.19和(W_(8))的情况下,以20 DAS Rs进行单手除草的情况下,实验的经济收益以净收益最大。 .19171.44 ha〜(-1)的B:C比为0.95,其后是@ 90 g ha〜(-1)的咪唑吡吡,其净收益为Rs.19086.74 ha〜(-1),B:C比值为1.04。在零耕作(T_(3))和杂草检查(W_(9))下观察到最小净收益率和B:C比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号