首页> 外文期刊>Critical Ultrasound Journal >Routine lung ultrasound to detect postoperative pulmonary complications following major abdominal surgery: a prospective observational feasibility study
【24h】

Routine lung ultrasound to detect postoperative pulmonary complications following major abdominal surgery: a prospective observational feasibility study

机译:大腹部手术后常规肺超声检查以发现术后肺部并发症:前瞻性观察可行性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundPostoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery are associated with adverse outcome. The diagnostic accuracy of chest X-rays (CXR) to detect pulmonary disorders is limited. Alternatively, lung ultrasound (LUS) is an established evidence-based point-of-care diagnostic modality which outperforms CXR in critical care. However, its feasibility and diagnostic ability for postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery are unknown. In this prospective observational feasibility study, we included consecutive patients undergoing major abdominal surgery with an intermediate or high risk developing postoperative pulmonary complications according to the Assess Respiratory risk In Surgical patients in CATalonia (ARISCAT) score. LUS was routinely performed on postoperative days 0–3 by a researcher blinded for CXR or other clinical findings. Then, reports were drawn up for LUS concerning feasibility and detection rates of postoperative pulmonary complications. CXRs were performed on demand according to daily clinical practice. Subsequently, we compared LUS and CXR findings.ResultsA total of 98 consecutive patients with an ARISCAT score of 41 (34–49) were included in the study. LUS was feasible in all patients. In 94 (95%) patients, LUS detected one or more postoperative pulmonary complications during the first four postoperative days. On day 0, LUS detected 31 out of 43 patients (72.1%) with one or more postoperative pulmonary complications, compared to 13 out of 36 patients (36.1%) with 1 or more postoperative pulmonary complications detected with CXR RR 2.0 (95 CI [1.24–3.20]) ( p =?0.004). The number of discordant observations between both modalities was high for atelectasis 23 (43%) and pleural effusion 29 (54%), but not for pneumothorax, respiratory infection and pulmonary edema 8 (15%), 3 (5%), and 5 (9%), respectively.ConclusionsThis study shows that LUS is highly feasible and frequently detects postoperative pulmonary complications after major abdominal surgery. Discordant observations in atelectasis and pleural effusions for LUS and CXR can be explained by a superior diagnostic ability of LUS in detecting these conditions. The effects of LUS as primary imaging modality on patient outcome should be evaluated in future studies.
机译:摘要背景大腹部手术后的肺部并发症与不良预后相关。胸部X射线(CXR)检测肺部疾病的诊断准确性受到限制。另外,肺部超声检查(LUS)是一种已建立的基于证据的即时诊断方法,在重症监护中优于CXR。但是,其在腹部手术后对肺部并发症的可行性和诊断能力尚不清楚。在这项前瞻性观察可行性研究中,我们根据CATalonia外科手术患者评估呼吸道危险评分(ARISCAT),纳入了连续进行大腹部手术的患者,这些患者患有中度或高危术后肺部并发症。 LUS通常在术后0至3天由一位对CXR或其他临床发现不知情的研究人员进行。然后,针对LUS编写了有关术后肺部并发症的可行性和检出率的报告。根据日常临床实践,按需执行CXR。随后,我们比较了LUS和CXR的发现。结果本研究共纳入98例ARISCAT评分为41(34-49)的连续患者。 LUS在所有患者中都是可行的。在94名(95%)患者中,LUS在术后前四天发现了一个或多个术后肺部并发症。在第0天,LUS在43例患者中有31例(72.1%)发生了一种或多种术后肺部并发症,而在36例患者中(36.1%)的13例中有1例或多种术后肺部并发症通过CXR RR 2.0(95 CI [ 1.24–3.20])(p =?0.004)。肺不张23例(43%)和胸腔积液29例(54%)的两种方法之间不一致的观察数很高,而气胸,呼吸道感染和肺水肿的8例(15%),3例(5%)和5例的不一致结论(9%)。结论这项研究表明,LUS是高度可行的,并且在腹部大手术后经常发现术后肺部并发症。 LUS在检测这些情况时的优越诊断能力可以解释LUS和CXR在肺不张和胸腔积液中的不一致观察结果。 LUS作为主要成像方式对患者预后的影响应在以后的研究中进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号