...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical Ultrasound Journal >Diagnostic performance of abdominal point of care ultrasound performed by an emergency physician in acute right iliac fossa pain
【24h】

Diagnostic performance of abdominal point of care ultrasound performed by an emergency physician in acute right iliac fossa pain

机译:急诊医师进行的腹部护理超声在急性右窝痛中的诊断作用

获取原文

摘要

Abstract BackgroundRight iliac fossa abdominal pain is a common reason for emergency ward admissions, its etiology is difficult to diagnose. It can be facilitated by an imaging examination, such as a Computerized Tomography scan which exposes the patient to ionizing radiation and implies delays. A bedside ultrasound performed by emergency physicians could avoid these issues. The aim of our study was to assess the performance of ultrasound carried out at the patient’s bedside by an emergency physician compared with a clinical-laboratory examination for the diagnosis of a surgical pathology in right iliac fossa pain.MethodsThis is a single-center prospective cohort study conducted in an Emergency Department receiving 19,000 patients per year. All patients presenting pain in the right iliac fossa were included by four (out of ten) emergency physicians certified in an ultrasound examination. A full grid pattern scan ultrasound of the abdominal cavity with analysis of the right iliac fossa was performed. The primary outcome was to compare the diagnosis performance of bedside ultrasound and clinical-laboratory examination to detect a surgical pathology. Two emergency physicians who did not participate in the study made the final diagnosis (i.e., surgical or non-surgical pathology) by reviewing the entire medical chart of each patient.ResultsFrom January 2011 to July 2013, 158 patients with a median age of 17 [13–32] years were analyzed. The diagnosed cases were: appendicitis (53), non-specific abdominal pain (48), lymphadenitis (22), ileitis (11), complicated ovarian cysts (7), neoplasias (5), inflammatory or infectious colitis (5), inguinal herniations (3), bowel obstructions (2), and salpingitis (2). The accuracy of ultrasound diagnoses was 0.89 (95% CI 0.84–0.94) versus 0.70 (95% CI 0.57–0.82) for diagnoses based on clinical-laboratory examination only ( p ?0.001).ConclusionBedsides, ultrasound allows an accurate diagnosis of a surgical pathology in 89% of cases, which is more efficient than the clinical-laboratory examination.
机译:摘要背景右ight窝腹痛是急诊病房住院的常见原因,其病因难以诊断。可以通过成像检查(例如,计算机断层扫描)使检查变得容易,该扫描使患者暴露于电离辐射下并暗示了延迟。急诊医师在床边进行超声检查可以避免这些问题。本研究的目的是评估急诊医师在床旁进行超声检查与临床实验室检查以诊断右窝疼痛的手术病理学相比的超声表现。方法这是一项单中心前瞻性队列研究这项研究是在急诊部进行的,每年接收19,000名患者。在超声检查中获得认证的四名(十分之十)急诊医师包括了所有在右窝出现疼痛的患者。对腹腔进行全网格模式超声扫描,并分析右窝。主要结果是比较床旁超声的诊断性能和临床实验室检查以检测手术病理。两名未参加研究的急诊医师通过回顾每位患者的整个病历表做出了最终诊断(即手术或非手术病理学)。结果从2011年1月至2013年7月,有158位患者的中位年龄为17岁[分析了13–32年。诊断病例为:阑尾炎(53),非特异性腹痛(48),淋巴结炎(22),回肠炎(11),卵巢复杂性囊肿(7),瘤形成(5),炎性或感染性结肠炎(5),腹股沟疝(3),肠梗阻(2)和输卵管炎(2)。超声诊断的准确性仅为0.89(95%CI 0.84–0.94),而仅基于临床实验室检查的诊断为0.70(95%CI 0.57–0.82)(p <?0.001)。手术病理学占89%,比临床实验室检查更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号