首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications >Sponsorship, conflict of interest, risk of bias, and reporting of participant's flow and baseline demographic information in studies applicable to the federal law to post the results in clinicaltrials.gov
【24h】

Sponsorship, conflict of interest, risk of bias, and reporting of participant's flow and baseline demographic information in studies applicable to the federal law to post the results in clinicaltrials.gov

机译:赞助,利益冲突,偏见风险以及在适用于联邦法律的研究中报告参与者的血流和基线人口统计信息,以将结果发布至Clinicaltrials.gov

获取原文
           

摘要

The US Congress passed the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act and Amendments Act, mandating that investigators post protocols and the results of all clinical studies enrolling human subjects in the United States in the trial registry clinicaltrials.gov within 1 year after study completion [1,2]. Sponsors and principal investigators who do not comply with the federal law are subject to financial penalties up to $10,000/day for failing to register or submit the results of trials. Numerous previous analyses suggested poor compliance with this policy [3–6]. However, previous analyses were not able to precisely identify studies' applicability to federal law, because this information is not in the publicly available Web version of the trial registry, clinicaltrials.gov[4,7]. The Aggregate Analysis of ClincalTrials.gov (AACT) database enabled us to analyze the entire set of registered studies and precise information about studies' applicability to federal law. We aimed to investigate sponsor compliance with federal law to post complete high-quality information about study and participant characteristics and outcomes. We assumed noncompliance when sponsors did not post the results or posted ambiguous data. The law clearly states a sponsor's responsibility for posting timely, complete, and accurate information about the study, sponsors, investigators, and participants [1,2]. Therefore, we assumed sponsor responsibility was the sole reason and did not speculate on other reasons for not posting information about studies labeled by registry administrators as “applicable clinical trial.” We analyzed sponsorship, conflict of interest, study design and risk of bias, and reporting of participants' flow and baseline demographics based on provided information in the database extracts from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) (https://www.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/aact-database).
机译:美国国会通过了《食品药品管理局现代化法案》和《修正案》,规定研究人员应在研究完成后1年内,将试验方案和所有将人类受试者招募到美国的临床研究结果发布到试验注册中心Clinicaltrials.gov中[1, 2]。不遵守联邦法律的申办者和主要研究者,如未注册或未提交试验结果,将面临每天最高10,000美元的罚款。先前的大量分析表明,该政策的执行不力[3-6]。但是,以前的分析不能准确地确定研究对联邦法律的适用性,因为该信息不在试验注册中心可公开获得的网络版本Clinicaltrials.gov [4,7]中。通过ClincalTrials.gov(AACT)数据库的综合分析,我们可以分析整套注册研究以及有关研究适用于联邦法律的准确信息。我们旨在调查赞助商对联邦法律的遵守情况,以发布有关研究,参与者特征和结果的完整高质量信息。当发起人未发布结果或发布不明确的数据时,我们假定不合规。法律明确规定了赞助者有责任及时,完整,准确地发布有关研究,赞助者,研究者和参与者的信息[1,2]。因此,我们认为发起人的责任是唯一的原因,并且没有推测其他原因,即没有发布有关注册管理机构标记为“适用临床试验”的研究信息。我们根据临床试验转型计划(CTTI)(https://www.ctti-)的数据库摘录中提供的信息,分析了赞助,利益冲突,研究设计和偏见风险,并报告了参与者的血流和基线人口统计数据。 Clinicaltrials.org/aact-database)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号