...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary Clinical Dentistry >Cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy in ceramic laminate veneering materials: A SEM analysis
【24h】

Cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy in ceramic laminate veneering materials: A SEM analysis

机译:陶瓷叠层饰面材料的宫颈和切缘的边际差异:SEM分析

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Context: Marginal discrepancy influenced by the choice of processing material used for the ceramic laminate veneers needs to be explored further for better clinical application. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the amount of cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy associated with different ceramic laminate veneering materials. Settings and Design: This was an experimental, single-blinded, in vitro trial. Subjects and Methods: Ten central incisors were prepared for laminate veneers with 2 mm uniform reduction and heavy chamfer finish line. Ceramic laminate veneers fabricated over the prepared teeth using four different processing materials were categorized into four groups as Group I - aluminous porcelain veneers, Group II - lithium disilicate ceramic veneers, Group III - lithium disilicate-leucite-based veneers, Group IV - zirconia-based ceramic veneers. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy was measured using a scanning electron microscope. Statistical Analysis Used: ANOVA and post hoc Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy for four groups was Group I - 114.6 ± 4.3 μm, 132.5 ± 6.5 μm, Group II - 86.1 ± 6.3 μm, 105.4 ± 5.3 μm, Group III - 71.4 ± 4.4 μm, 91.3 ± 4.7 μm, and Group IV - 123.1 ± 4.1 μm, 142.0 ± 5.4 μm. ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD tests observed a statistically significant difference between the four test specimens with regard to cervical marginal discrepancy. The cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy scored F = 243.408, P F = 180.844, P Conclusion: This study concluded veneers fabricated using leucite reinforced lithium disilicate exhibited the least marginal discrepancy followed by lithium disilicate ceramic, aluminous porcelain, and zirconia-based ceramics. The marginal discrepancy was more in the incisal region than in the cervical region in all the groups.
机译:背景:由于陶瓷层压板饰面的加工材料选择的影响,边际差异需要进一步探索,以更好地应用于临床。目的:本研究旨在评估与不同陶瓷层压饰面材料相关的宫颈和切缘的差异。设置和设计:这是一项实验性的单盲体外试验。对象和方法:准备10个中央门牙用于层压贴面,具有2mm均匀缩小和较厚的倒角线。使用四种不同的加工材料在准备好的牙齿上制成的陶瓷层压薄板可分为四类:第一类-铝陶瓷薄板,第二类-二硅酸锂陶瓷薄板,第三类-二硅酸锂-白云母基薄板,第四类-氧化锆-基陶瓷贴面。使用扫描电子显微镜测量宫颈和切缘的边缘差异。使用的统计分析:方差分析和事后Tukey诚实诚实差异(HSD)测试用于统计分析。结果:四组宫颈和切缘边缘差异为I组-114.6±4.3μm,132.5±6.5μm,II组-86.1±6.3μm,105.4±5.3μm,III组-71.4±4.4μm,91.3±4.7μm ,以及IV组-123.1±4.1μm,142.0±5.4μm。方差分析和事后Tukey HSD测试在宫颈边缘差异方面观察到四个测试样本之间的统计学差异。宫颈和切缘的边缘差异得分为F = 243.408,PF = 180.844,P结论:这项研究得出结论,由白云石增强的二硅酸锂制成的贴面显示出的边缘差异最小,其次是二硅酸锂陶瓷,铝质瓷和氧化锆基陶瓷。在所有组中,切缘区域的边缘差异大于子宫颈区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号