...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care nurse >Predicting the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers in Critical Care Patients
【24h】

Predicting the Risk for Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcers in Critical Care Patients

机译:预测重症患者医院获得性压疮的风险

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND Assessments of risk for pressure ulcers in critical care patients may not include important predictors. OBJECTIVE To construct risk-prediction models of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in intensive care patients and compare the modelsa?? predictive validities with validity of the Braden Scale. METHODS Data were collected retrospectively on patients admitted to intensive care from October 2011 through October 2013. Logistic regression and decision trees were used to construct the risk-prediction models. Predictive validity was measured by using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the curve. RESULTS With logistic regression analysis, 6 factors were significant independent predictors. With the decision tree, 4 types of high-risk populations were identified. Predictive validity of Braden Scale scores was lower than the validities of the logistic regression and the decision tree models. CONCLUSION Risk for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers is overpredicted with the Braden Scale, with low specificity and low positive predictive value
机译:背景技术重症监护患者中压疮风险的评估可能不包括重要的预测因素。目的建立重症监护患者医院获得性压疮的风险预测模型,并进行模型比较。预测效度与Braden量表的有效性。方法回顾性收集2011年10月至2013年10月接受重症监护的患者的数据。采用Logistic回归和决策树构建风险预测模型。通过使用敏感性,特异性,阳性和阴性预测值以及曲线下面积来衡量预测有效性。结果通过逻辑回归分析,有6个因素是重要的独立预测因子。通过决策树,确定了4种高风险人群。 Braden Scale评分的预测效度低于逻辑回归和决策树模型的效度。结论Braden量表高估了医院获得性压疮的风险,特异性低,阳性预测值低

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号