首页> 外文期刊>Comparative Effectiveness Research >Unannounced or announced periodic hospital surveys: a study protocol for a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Unannounced or announced periodic hospital surveys: a study protocol for a nationwide cluster-randomized controlled trial

机译:未经宣布或宣布的定期医院调查:一项针对全国性集群随机对照试验的研究方案

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: Accreditation programs for health care systems have been implemented in more than 70 countries to stimulate high-quality organizational performance. Several Danish health care institutions are covered by the Danish Healthcare Quality Program (DDKM), and all Danish public hospitals have been accredited according to the DDKM since 2010. The dates of each survey are currently announced beforehand. Announcing surveys has been criticized for creating an “arranged reality”. It was therefore suggested that a national intervention be conducted to evaluate the effect of unannounced hospital surveys. The objective is to evaluate the effect of unannounced hospital surveys compared to the conventional announced hospital surveys by conducting a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Methods: All public somatic and psychiatric hospitals in Denmark (n=30) were invited to participate. Twenty-three hospitals (77%) agreed to participate and to be randomized to one of the trial clusters. Eleven hospitals received announced surveys (control group) and 12 hospitals received unannounced surveys (intervention group). We hypothesized that hospitals receiving unannounced surveys would be rated as less successful than hospitals receiving announced surveys, defined as meeting less compliance with accreditation standards and performance indicators. Surveyors employed and educated by the Danish Institute for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care (IKAS) were responsible for conducting the surveys according to an abbreviated version of the current Danish Healthcare Quality Program (DDKM). The outcome is compliance with indicators reflecting organizational performance. Compliance was analyzed using binomial regression analyses with bootstrapped standard errors. Discussion: Unannounced hospital surveys are expected to reveal less compliance with performance indicators compared to the announced hospital surveys. These study results may facilitate a validation of the effect of unannounced periodic hospital surveys influencing the decision of whether or not unannounced surveys should be implemented as a new method of conducting accreditation programs in Danish hospitals.
机译:目的:已在70多个国家实施了医疗保健系统认证计划,以刺激高质量的组织绩效。丹麦医疗质量计划(DDKM)涵盖了几家丹麦医疗机构,并且自2010年以来,所有丹麦公立医院均已获得DDKM的认可。每项调查的日期目前已事先宣布。宣布调查已因创建“安排好的现实”而受到批评。因此,建议采取国家干预措施来评估未经宣布的医院调查的效果。目的是通过进行聚类随机对照试验来评估未宣布的医院调查与传统的已公布医院调查相比的效果。方法:邀请丹麦(n = 30)的所有公立躯体和精神科医院参加。 23家医院(77%)同意参加,并被随机分配到其中一个试验组。 11家医院接受了宣布的调查(对照组),12家医院接受了未宣布的调查(干预组)。我们假设接受未经突击调查的医院的成功程度不如接受突击调查的医院(定义为不满足认可标准和绩效指标的情况)。由丹麦卫生质量和认证研究所(IKAS)雇用和教育的测量师根据当前的丹麦医疗质量计划(DDKM)的缩写版本负责进行调查。结果是符合反映组织绩效的指标。使用二项式回归分析和自举标准误差对合规性进行了分析。讨论:与已宣布的医院调查相比,未进行的医院调查预计将显示对绩效指标的依从性较低。这些研究结果可能有助于验证未经宣布的定期医院调查的影响,该影响影响了是否应将未经通知的调查作为在丹麦医院进行认证计划的一种新方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号