...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology >Effects of the Nature of Adjuvant and Site of Parenteral Immunization on the Serum and Mucosal Immune Responses Induced by a Nasal Boost with a Vaccine Alone
【24h】

Effects of the Nature of Adjuvant and Site of Parenteral Immunization on the Serum and Mucosal Immune Responses Induced by a Nasal Boost with a Vaccine Alone

机译:佐剂的性质和肠胃外免疫接种部位对单独接种鼻腔疫苗引起的血清和粘膜免疫反应的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Outbred OF1 mice were immunized subcutaneously with flu vaccine, either in the neck or in the lumbar region (back), in combination with adjuvants inducing either a Th1- or a Th2-type response, referred to as adjuvants A1 and A2, respectively. After two parenteral immunizations, the mice were boosted intranasally with nonadjuvanted vaccine. The serum response was analyzed after each immunization by measuring specific immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG1, and IgG2a antibody levels, while the local response (same isotypes) was measured in the salivary glands after the mucosal boost by ELISPOTs. We observed that systemic priming at any of the two sites with a Th2 rather than a Th1 adjuvant dramatically enhanced the mucosal IgG1 and IgA responses following a mucosal boost with unadjuvanted vaccine. In addition, as judged by the IgG2a/IgG1 ratios and serum IgA levels, immunization of mice in the back induced a rise in Th2 response compared to neck immunization with adjuvant A1. In contrast, such back immunization with adjuvant A2 reversed the Th1-Th2 balance in favor of the Th1 response compared to neck immunization. Similar differences were observed in mucosal antibody levels according to the site of priming with one given adjuvant; priming in the back with adjuvant A1 increased the mucosal IgA and IgG1 responses compared to neck priming, while the local IgG2a levels were decreased. The reverse was true for adjuvant A2. Back versus neck priming with this latter adjuvant decreased the mucosal IgG1 response, while local IgG2a levels were increased. The different lymphatic drainages of the two sites of parenteral immunization may explain these differences, due to the targeting of particular lymphoid inductive sites. Some of these sites may represent crossroads between systemic and mucosal immunity.
机译:用流感疫苗在颈部或腰部区域(背部)皮下免疫近交的OF1小鼠,并与分别诱导Th1或Th2型应答的佐剂结合,分别称为佐剂A1和A2。两次肠胃外免疫后,用非佐剂疫苗对小鼠进行鼻内加强免疫。每次免疫后,通过测量特异性免疫球蛋白A(IgA),IgG1和IgG2a抗体水平来分析血清反应,而通过ELISPOTs增强粘膜后在唾液腺中测量局部反应(同种型)。我们观察到,在使用非佐剂疫苗进行粘膜加强后,使用Th2佐剂而不是Th1佐剂在两个位点的任何一个处进行全身性引发均可显着增强粘膜IgG1和IgA反应。此外,根据IgG2a / IgG1的比例和血清IgA水平判断,与佐剂A1的颈部免疫相比,背部小鼠的免疫接种引起Th2反应增强。相反,与颈部免疫相比,用佐剂A2进行的这种反向免疫逆转了Th1-Th2平衡,有利于Th1反应。根据一种给定佐剂的引发部位,在粘膜抗体水平上观察到相似的差异。与颈部启动相比,佐剂A1在背部启动可增加粘膜IgA和IgG1反应,而局部IgG2a水平则降低。对于佐剂A2,情况恰恰相反。使用后一种佐剂进行的背部和颈部引发可降低粘膜IgG1反应,而局部IgG2a水平则升高。由于靶向特定的淋巴诱导部位,肠胃外免疫接种两个部位的淋巴引流不同可能解释了这些差异。这些部位中的某些部位可能代表全身免疫和粘膜免疫之间的交叉路口。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号