...
首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Biometry and Crop Science >Should we trust graphs' default settings in the R packages?
【24h】

Should we trust graphs' default settings in the R packages?

机译:我们应该信任R包中图形的默认设置吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

Nowadays, we cannot imagine conducting analysis and creating any graph without support of various computer programs. They make researchers’ work easier. No matter how good their computer skills are, it is always nice to have some help, and that is what default settings usually are for. It is believed that using default settings of graphical software, one should not worry about choice of graph settings. But is it actually true? Perhaps researchers are putting too much trust in default settings? In this article, we will try to show that default settings are not always as helpful as it seems. We will demonstrate this with examples of three packages in R: graphics, lattice and ggplot2.
机译:如今,我们无法想象在没有各种计算机程序支持的情况下进行分析并创建任何图形。它们使研究人员的工作更加轻松。无论他们的计算机技能多么出色,获得一些帮助总是很好,这就是默认设置通常的目的。可以相信,使用图形软件的默认设置,您不必担心图形设置的选择。但这是真的吗?也许研究人员对默认设置过于信任?在本文中,我们将尝试证明默认设置并不总是像看起来那样有用。我们将用R中的三个包的示例来演示这一点:图形,晶格和ggplot2。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号