【24h】

When Extremes Converge

机译:当极端融合时

获取原文
       

摘要

Abstract Not only but particularly in terms of labor migration policy Germany and Canada are widely perceived as being situated at opposite ends of the spectrum. Whereas Canada has for a long time been enjoying a reputation of being one or even the role model for countries seeking to develop a flexible and welcoming immigration scheme that is nonetheless responsive to shortages and demands of specific sectors of the national labor market, the German system has been suffering from the suspicion of being not only structurally hostile towards immigrants but also of featuring a structural one-sidedness in terms of its steering, control and recruitment instruments. Against the background of major immigration reforms in the segment of highly skilled labor migration in both countries the paper describes and analyzes the core elements of these recent policy reforms, arguing that Canada and Germany as of 2013 increasingly display more similarities than differences in their high-skilled labor immigration policy. Both countries have departed from extreme and one-sided steering approaches and now run ‘hybrid systems’ that aim at making use of the advantages of different steering and recruitment approaches.
机译:摘要不仅在劳务移民政策方面,尤其是在德国和加拿大,人们普遍认为它们处于相反的地位。尽管加拿大长期以来一直享有作为成为甚至是榜样的声誉的声誉,这些国家正在寻求制定灵活而热情的移民计划,尽管如此,该计划却能应对国家劳动力市场特定部门的短缺和需求,德国系统人们一直怀疑不仅在结构上对移民有敌意,而且在指导,控制和招募手段方面也表现出结构性的一方面。在这两个国家的高技能劳动力移民领域进行重大移民改革的背景下,本文描述并分析了这些近期政策改革的核心要素,并指出,截至2013年,加拿大和德国在相似之处上的差异远大于差异,技术工人移民政策。两国都脱离了极端的和单一的指导方法,现在运行的“混合系统”旨在利用不同的指导和招聘方法的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号