...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology >Endoscopic comparison of gastroduodenal injury with over-the-counter doses of new fast-dissolving ibuprofen and paracetamol formulations: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover clinical trial
【24h】

Endoscopic comparison of gastroduodenal injury with over-the-counter doses of new fast-dissolving ibuprofen and paracetamol formulations: a randomized, placebo-controlled, 4-way crossover clinical trial

机译:内镜比较胃十二指肠损伤与非处方剂量新的速溶布洛芬和扑热息痛制剂的比较:一项随机,安慰剂对照,四向交叉试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: While gastrointestinal (GI) effects of standard ibuprofen and N-acetyl-p--aminophenol (APAP) have been reported, upper GI injury following treatment with fast-dissolving (FD) formulations of these analgesics has not been investigated. We evaluated upper GI effects of over-the-counter doses of 2 FD ibuprofen products and 1 FD-APAP product. Methods: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, endoscopist-blinded, 4-way crossover study, 28 healthy subjects received FD ibuprofen 2×200 mg liquid capsules 3 times daily (TID), ibuprofen 2×200 mg tablets TID, FD-APAP 2×500 mg tablets 4 times daily (QID), and placebo 2×500 mg tablets QID for 7 days. The primary end point was gastric mucosal damage assessed by endoscopy using the Lanza scale: 0=normal stomach or proximal duodenum, 1=mucosal hemorrhages only, 2=1 or 2 erosions, 3=numerous (3–10) erosions, and 4=large number of erosions (>10) or ulcer. Secondary end points included duodenal mucosal damage (Lanza scale); gastroduodenal mucosal injury, classified as present (gastric and/or duodenal endoscopy score ≥2) or absent (gastric and/or duodenal endoscopy score <2); and number of hemorrhages, erosions, and ulcers counted separately in the stomach and duodenum. Results: Significantly greater gastric mucosal injury was observed after treatment with both ibuprofen products vs FD-APAP ( p <0.0001 and p =0.0095, respectively). FD-APAP showed no difference from placebo ( p =0.4794). The odds of having an incidence of gastroduodenal mucosal injury were over 6 times greater from FD ibuprofen liquid capsule treatment (odds ratio [OR]=6.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.60, 23.97) and over 3 times greater from ibuprofen tablet treatment (OR=3.19, 95% CI: 0.8, 12.74) vs FD-APAP. Conclusion: Treatment with 2 ibuprofen products was associated with significant gastric mucosal injury. Of the 4 treatments studied, FD ibuprofen liquid capsules had the highest risk of incidence of gastroduodenal mucosal injury. Treatment with FD-APAP did not induce any clinically or statistically significant gastroduodenal mucosal injury.
机译:背景:尽管已经报道了标准布洛芬和N-乙酰基-对氨基苯酚(APAP)对胃肠道的影响,但尚未研究使用这些镇痛药的速溶(FD)制剂治疗后的上消化道损伤。我们评估了2 FD布洛芬产品和1 FD-APAP产品的非处方药对较高胃肠道的影响。方法:在一项随机,安慰剂对照,内镜盲,4交叉研究中,28名健康受试者接受每日3次(TID)的FD布洛芬2×200 mg液体胶囊,TID,FD-APAP的布洛芬2×200 mg片剂2×500毫克片剂,每天4次(QID),安慰剂2×500毫克片剂,QID 7天。主要终点是通过胃镜检查使用Lanza量表评估的胃粘膜损害:0 =正常胃或十二指肠近端,1 =仅粘膜出血,2 = 1或2糜烂,3 =大量(3-10)糜烂,4 =大量糜烂(> 10)或溃疡。次要终点包括十二指肠粘膜损伤(Lanza评分);胃十二指肠粘膜损伤,分类为目前(胃和/或十二指肠内镜评分≥2)或不存在(胃和/或十二指肠内镜评分<2);胃和十二指肠的出血,糜烂和溃疡的数量分别计算。结果:两种布洛芬产品与FD-APAP相比治疗后观察到的胃粘膜损伤明显更大(分别为p <0.0001和p = 0.0095)。 FD-APAP与安慰剂无差异(p = 0.4794)。 FD布洛芬液体胶囊治疗发生胃十二指肠粘膜损伤的几率超过6倍(几率[OR] = 6.19,95%置信区间[CI]:1.60、23.97),比布洛芬片剂大3倍以上治疗(OR = 3.19,95%CI:0.8,12.74)vs FD-APAP。结论:2种布洛芬产品治疗与胃黏膜严重损伤有关。在研究的4种治疗方法中,FD布洛芬液体胶囊发生胃十二指肠粘膜损伤的风险最高。 FD-APAP治疗不会引起任何临床或统计学上显着的胃十二指肠粘膜损伤。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号