...
首页> 外文期刊>CCAMLR science: journal of the Scientific Committee and the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources >Length-based assessments revisited – why stock status and fishing mortality of long-lived species such as toothfish cannot be inferred from length-frequency data alone
【24h】

Length-based assessments revisited – why stock status and fishing mortality of long-lived species such as toothfish cannot be inferred from length-frequency data alone

机译:再次进行基于长度的评估–为什么不能仅从长度-频率数据中推断出长寿命物种(如牙鱼)的种群状况和捕鱼死亡率

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In many of CCAMLR’s new and exploratory fisheries, stock assessment techniques are still in development. The failure of the tag-recapture program to provide robust assessments in many areas and doubts about using unstandardised catch rate data have led to a desire to draw inferences about stock status and fishing mortality from length-frequency data alone. In this paper, a number of length-based stock assessment methods are revisited and some limitations in their ability to draw robust inferences about stock status and fishing mortality for long-lived fish species such as Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) are illustrated. While length-frequency data can be useful in assessments when integrated with other informative estimators for stock abundance and productivity, the review and the simulations highlight that interpretation of raw length-frequency data and single length-based indicators for stock status and fishing mortality is problematic and should be avoided.
机译:在CCAMLR的许多新的探索性渔业中,种群评估技术仍在开发中。标签捕获计划未能在许多领域提供可靠的评估,并且对使用非标准化捕捞率数据的怀疑导致人们渴望仅从长度频率数据中得出种群状况和捕捞死亡率的推论。在本文中,重新审视了许多基于长度的种群评估方法,并说明了它们对诸如巴塔哥尼亚牙鱼(Dissostichus eleginoides)之类的长寿鱼类的种群状况和捕捞死亡率得出可靠推断的能力的局限性。虽然长度频率数据在与其他信息估计器结合使用时可用于评估种群数量和生产力,但在评估中很有用,但审查和模拟结果突出表明,对原始长度频率数据和基于单个长度的种群状况和捕鱼死亡率指标的解释存在问题并且应该避免。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号