...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical proteomics. >Implementation and evaluation of amyloidosis subtyping by laser-capture microdissection and tandem mass spectrometry
【24h】

Implementation and evaluation of amyloidosis subtyping by laser-capture microdissection and tandem mass spectrometry

机译:激光捕获显微切割和串联质谱法对淀粉样变性亚型的实施和评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Correct identification of the amyloidosis-causing protein is crucial for clinical management. Recently the Mayo Clinic reported laser-capture microdissection (LCM) with liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) as a new diagnostic tool for amyloid diagnosis. Here, we report an independent implementation of this proteomic diagnostics method at the Princess Alexandra Hospital Amyloidosis Centre in Brisbane, Australia. Results From 2010 to 2014, 138 biopsies received from 35 different organ sites were analysed by LCM-MS/MS using Congo Red staining to visualise amyloid deposits. There was insufficient tissue in the block for LCM for 7 cases. An amyloid forming protein was ultimately identified in 121 out of 131 attempted cases (94?%). Of the 121 successful cases, the Mayo Clinic amyloid proteomic signature (at least two of Serum Amyloid P, ApoE and ApoA4) was detected in 92 (76?%). Low levels of additional amyloid forming proteins were frequently identified with the main amyloid forming protein, which may reflect co-deposition of fibrils. Furthermore, vitronectin and clusterin were frequently identified in our samples. Adding vitronectin to the amyloid signature increases the number of positive cases, suggesting a potential 4th protein for the signature. In terms of clinical impact, amyloid typing by immunohistochemistry was attempted in 88 cases, reported as diagnostic in 39, however, 5 were subsequently revealed by proteomic?analysis to be incorrect. Overall, the referring clinician’s diagnosis of amyloid subtype was altered by proteomic analysis in 24?% of cases. While LCM-MS/MS was highly robust in protein identification, clinical information was still required for subtyping, particularly for systemic versus localized amyloidosis. Conclusions This study reports the independent implementation and evaluation of a proteomics-based diagnostic for amyloidosis subtyping. Our results support LCM-MS/MS as a powerful new diagnostic technique for amyloidosis, but also identified some challenges and further development opportunities.
机译:背景正确识别引起淀粉样变性的蛋白质对于临床治疗至关重要。最近,Mayo诊所报道了采用液相色谱-串联质谱(MS / MS)的激光捕获显微切割(LCM)作为淀粉样蛋白诊断的新诊断工具。在这里,我们报告了澳大利亚布里斯班公主亚历山大医院淀粉样变性病中心对这种蛋白质组学诊断方法的独立实施。结果2010年至2014年,使用刚果红染色通过LCM-MS / MS分析了来自35个不同器官部位的138份活检样本,以显示淀粉样蛋白沉积物。 7例患者的LCM块组织不足。在131例尝试中的病例中,最终鉴定出了淀粉样蛋白形成蛋白(94%)。在121例成功病例中,在92例(76%)中检出了梅奥诊所的淀粉样蛋白组学特征(血清淀粉样蛋白P,ApoE和ApoA4中至少两个)。低水平的其他淀粉样蛋白形成蛋白经常与主要的淀粉样蛋白形成蛋白一起鉴定,这可能反映了原纤维的共沉积。此外,在我们的样本中经常发现玻连蛋白和簇蛋白。将玻连蛋白添加到淀粉样蛋白标记物上会增加阳性病例的数量,表明该标记物可能是第四个蛋白。就临床影响而言,尝试了88例通过免疫组织化学对淀粉样蛋白进行分型,据报道39例诊断为,但随后通过蛋白质组学分析发现5例是不正确的。总体而言,通过蛋白质组学分析,转诊的临床医生对淀粉样蛋白亚型的诊断在24%的病例中有所改变。尽管LCM-MS / MS在蛋白质鉴定方面非常强大,但仍需要临床信息来进行亚型分析,尤其是系统性淀粉样变性与局部性淀粉样变性。结论本研究报告了基于蛋白质组学的淀粉样变性亚型诊断的独立实施和评估。我们的结果支持LCM-MS / MS作为一种强大的淀粉样变性新诊断技术,但也发现了一些挑战和进一步的发展机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号