首页> 外文期刊>Clinical ophthalmology >Comparison of Scheimpflug imaging parameters between steep and keratoconic corneas of Caucasian eyes
【24h】

Comparison of Scheimpflug imaging parameters between steep and keratoconic corneas of Caucasian eyes

机译:高加索人角膜圆锥角膜和圆锥角膜Scheimpflug成像参数的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare the keratometric and pachymetric parameters of healthy eyes with those affected by steep cornea and keratoconus (KC) using Scheimpflug camera. Setting: Briz-L Eye Clinic, Baku, Azerbaijan. Design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: In this study, 49 KC (Amsler–Krumeich stage 1) eyes and 36 healthy eyes were enrolled. A complete ophthalmic evaluation and a Scheimpflug camera scan were performed in every eye included in the study. Tomographic parameters such as parameters from the front and back cornea, maximum keratometry reading (Kmax), corneal volume (CV), anterior chamber volume (ChV), anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber angle (AC angle), keratometric power deviation (KPD), maximum front elevation (Max FE), and maximum back elevation (Max BE), as well as pachymetric progression indices (PPI), Ambrosio relational thickness (ART), index of surface variance (ISV), index of vertical asymmetry (IVA), center keratoconus index (CKI), index of height asymmetry (IHA), index of height decentration (IHD), and radius?minimum (RM) were collected and statistically compared between the two groups. Results: PPI, ART, ISV, IVA, CKI, IHA, IHD, and RM parameter values were significantly different ( P <0.05) between the KC and healthy eyes. There were no significant differences in K mean and Q values of the frontal corneal parameters, as well as in Kmax, AC angle, RM, back, and front astigmatism, between stage 1 keratoconic and normal Caucasian eyes with steep cornea. All other parameters such as K mean and Q values of the back corneal parameters, Max FE, Max BE, ACD, ChV, and CV showed significant differences between the groups ( P <0.05 for all). Conclusion: Scheimpflug imaging is able to detect corneal morphological differences between stage 1 KC eyes and healthy eyes with steep cornea, in Caucasians.
机译:目的:使用Scheimpflug摄像机比较健康眼睛与受陡峭角膜和圆锥角膜(KC)影响的健康眼睛的角膜测量和测厚参数。地点:阿塞拜疆巴库Briz-L眼科诊所。设计:横断面研究。方法:本研究纳入了49只KC(Amsler–Krumeich阶段1)眼和36只健康眼。在研究中对每只眼睛进行了全面的眼科评估和Scheimpflug相机扫描。断层扫描参数,例如来自前后角膜的参数,最大角膜曲率读数(Kmax),角膜体积(CV),前房体积(ChV),前房深度(ACD),前房角(AC角),角膜屈光度偏差(KPD),最大前仰角(Max FE)和最大后仰角(Max BE),以及测速级数指数(PPI),Ambrosio关系厚度(ART),表面变化指数(ISV),垂直非对称指数收集IVA,圆锥角膜中心指数(CKI),高度不对称指数(IHA),高度偏心指数(IHD)和最小半径半径(RM),并进行统计学比较。结果:KC和健康眼睛之间的PPI,ART,ISV,IVA,CKI,IHA,IHD和RM参数值显着不同(P <0.05)。在第1期圆锥​​角膜和正常高加索角膜陡峭的白种人眼睛之间,额角膜参数的K均值和Q值以及Kmax,AC角,RM,背部和前部散光没有显着差异。所有其他参数,例如后角膜参数的K均值和Q值,最大FE,最大BE,ACD,ChV和CV均显示两组之间的显着差异(所有P均<0.05)。结论:Scheimpflug成像能够检测高加索人的1期KC阶段眼睛和角膜陡峭的健康眼睛之间的角膜形态学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号