...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinics >Coronary revascularization with the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: comparison of short-term clinical evolution between elective and emergency surgery
【24h】

Coronary revascularization with the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery: comparison of short-term clinical evolution between elective and emergency surgery

机译:左胸内动脉和radial动脉的冠状动脉血运重建:择期手术和急诊手术短期临床进展的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Left internal thoracic artery-to left anterior descending artery grafting has become a fundamental part of coronary artery bypass grafting. This grafting has led to increased use of other arterial conduits, of which the radial artery is most popular. Whether radial grafting can be used in the emergency patient is not known. This study compares the short-term clinical evolution between elective vs emergency coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with left internal thoracic artery and radial artery. METHODS: A retrospective study of 47 patients who underwent elective or emergency coronary artery bypass grafting from 1996 to 2003. All patients had coronary stenosis >70% in all target vessels. Only the left internal thoracic artery and radial artery were used as grafts. Patients were divided into elective group (23 patients) and emergency group (24 patients). Emergency criteria were unstable angina and/or critical coronary stenosis with high risk for acute myocardial infarction. Groups were similar for age and number of diseased vessels. RESULTS: The mean number of left internal thoracic artery grafts per patient in the elective and emergency groups were respectively 1.17 and 1.38 (P = .17). The mean number of radial artery grafts per patient in the elective and emergency groups was respectively 2.26 and 2.08 (P = .48). The 30-day mortality was 0. There was no postoperative cardiogenic shock. The elective group had 1 acute myocardial infarction (4.4%) postoperatively, and emergency group had 5 (20.8%). A nonsignificant trend towards acute myocardial infarction was noted in the emergency group (P = .18). Intensive care unit and postoperative stay were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Coronary artery bypass grafting using left internal thoracic artery and radial artery accomplishing complete revascularization can be performed in emergency patients with results similar to those for elective patients.
机译:背景:左胸内动脉至左前降支移植已成为冠状动脉搭桥术的基本组成部分。这种移植导致更多使用其他动脉导管,其中radial动脉最为流行。径向移植是否可以用于急诊患者尚不清楚。这项研究比较了左胸内动脉和radial动脉的选择性与紧急冠状动脉搭桥术之间的短期临床进展。方法:回顾性研究了1996年至2003年接受择期或急诊冠状动脉搭桥术的47例患者。所有患者在所有目标血管中的冠状动脉狭窄均> 70%。仅将左胸内动脉和radial动脉用作移植物。患者分为选择性组(23例)和急诊组(24例)。紧急标准是不稳定型心绞痛和/或严重的冠状动脉狭窄,并有急性心肌梗塞的高风险。各组的年龄和患病血管数量相似。结果:选修组和急诊组中每位患者的左胸内动脉移植物平均数分别为1.17和1.38(P = .17)。选修组和急诊组每名患者的radial动脉移植物平均数分别为2.26和2.08(P = .48)。 30天死亡率为0。无术后心源性休克。选择性组术后有1例急性心肌梗塞(4.4%),紧急组有5例(20.8%)。急诊组发现急性心肌梗死无明显趋势(P = .18)。两组的重症监护病房和术后住院时间相似。结论:在急诊患者中,可使用左胸内动脉和radial动脉进行冠状动脉旁路移植术,以完成完全的血运重建,其结果与择期患者相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号