首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Medicine Insights: Women's Health >Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures
【24h】

Estimation of Gastric Volume Before Anesthesia in Term-Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section, Compared With Non-pregnant or First-Trimester Women Undergoing Minor Gynecological Surgical Procedures

机译:接受择期剖宫产的足月妊娠妇女与接受小妇科手术的未妊娠或早孕妇女的麻醉前胃容积估算

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Traditionally, intubation of pregnant women has been performed using a rapid sequence induction. This is due to the classical concept that women with more than 18?weeks of pregnancy (mid-second trimester) are always considered to have an increased risk of aspiration due to a number of factors, regardless of the fasting duration. Rapid sequence induction is associated with a higher rate of adverse events. Aims: Our study aimed to illuminate the hypothesis that there is no difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant women and non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Accordingly, we measured gastric volume and content before anesthesia in term-pregnant women undergoing elective cesarean section, and to compare it with non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were undergoing minor gynecological surgical procedures. Methods: In this single-center prospective study, the gastric volume and content were assessed by abdominal ultrasound (AUS) just prior to the scheduled procedure. AUS was performed in the sagittal or para-sagittal plain in the upright position and the stomach content was estimated according to the antral circumferential area. Group 1 consisted of 50 term-pregnant women scheduled for cesarean section. Group 2 consisted of 45 non-pregnant or first-trimester pregnant women who were scheduled for minor gynecologic procedure. Results: Despite significant longer fasting time prior to the interventional procedure in the non-pregnant or first-trimester women group, there was no significant difference in gastric volume between term-pregnant and first-trimester pregnant women (3.2?±?0.97?cm ~(2) vs 3.2?±?0.79?cm ~(2);? P ?=?.97). Gastric volume was small in the two groups. Conclusion: Fasting gastric volume before cesarean section in term-pregnant women is small and is not different than in non-pregnant or first-trimester women undergoing minor gynecologic procedures. Ultrasound estimation of gastric volume is a reliable and easy-to-perform technique which might help in decision-making regarding the airway management prior to induction of anesthesia in pregnant women.
机译:背景:传统上,使用快速序列诱导进行孕妇插管。这是由于经典概念所致,无论禁食时间长短,受多种因素影响,总是认为怀孕18周以上(中期中期)的妇女发生误吸的风险增加。快速序列诱导与更高的不良事件发生率相关。目的:我们的研究旨在阐明以下假设:正在接受小妇科手术的足月妊娠妇女与未妊娠或初孕的孕妇之间的胃容量没有差异。因此,我们测量了接受选择性剖宫产的足月妊娠妇女的麻醉前胃体积和含量,并将其与接受小妇科手术的未妊娠或早孕孕妇进行比较。方法:在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,在排定程序之前,通过腹部超声(AUS)评估了胃的容积和含量。 AUS在直立位置的矢状或矢状旁平原进行,根据胃窦周围区域估算胃内容物。第一组由计划剖宫产的50名足月妊娠妇女组成。第2组由45名未怀孕或早孕的孕妇组成,这些孕妇计划进行妇科小手术。结果:尽管在非妊娠或初孕妇女组中,介入治疗前的禁食时间明显延长,但足月妊娠和初孕妇女的胃容量没有显着差异(3.2?±?0.97?cm) 〜(2)与3.2°±0.79cm·cm〜(2);βP =α.97)。两组的胃容积均较小。结论:足月妊娠妇女剖宫产前的空腹胃体积很小,与接受小儿科手术的未妊娠或早孕妇女没有区别。超声估计胃体积是一种可靠且易于执行的技术,可能有助于在孕妇进行麻醉之前进行有关气道管理的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号