首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >'De-escalation' strategy using micafungin for the treatment of systemic Candida infections: budget impact in France and Germany
【24h】

'De-escalation' strategy using micafungin for the treatment of systemic Candida infections: budget impact in France and Germany

机译:米卡芬净用于治疗全身性感染的“降级”策略:在法国和德国的预算影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The incidence of azole-resistant Candida infections is increasing. Consequently, guidelines for treating systemic Candida infection (SCI) recommend a “de-escalation” strategy: initial broad-spectrum antifungal agents (e.g.,?echinocandins), followed by switching to fluconazole if isolates are fluconazole sensitive, rather than “escalation” with initial fluconazole treatment and then switching to echinocandins if isolates are fluconazole resistant. However, fluconazole may continue to be used as first-line treatment in view of its low acquisition costs. The aim of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the budget impact of the de-escalation strategy using micafungin compared with the escalation strategy in France and Germany. Methods: A budget impact model was used to compare de-escalation to escalation strategies. As well as survival, clinical success (resolution/reduction of symptoms and radiographic abnormalities associated with fungal infection), was considered, as was mycological success (eradication of Candida from the bloodstream). Health economic outcomes included cost per health state according to clinical success and mycological success, and budget impact. A 42-day time horizon was used. Results: For all patients with SCI, the budget impact of using de-escalation rather than escalation was greater, but improved rates of survival, clinical success and mycological success were apparent with de-escalation. In patients with fluconazole-resistant isolates, clinical success rates and survival were improved by ~72% with de-escalation versus escalation, producing cost savings of €6,374 and €356 per patient in France and Germany, respectively; improvements of ~72% in mycological success rates with de-escalation versus escalation did not translate into cost savings. Conclusion: Modeling provides evidence that when treating SCI in individuals at risk of azole-resistant infections, de-escalation from micafungin has potential cost savings associated with improved clinical success rates.
机译:背景:耐唑类念珠菌感染的发生率正在增加。因此,用于治疗全身性念珠菌感染(SCI)的指南建议采取“降级”策略:初始使用广谱抗真菌药(例如,棘孢菌素),如果分离株对氟康唑敏感,则改用氟康唑,而不是“升级”。最初进行氟康唑治疗,如果分离物对氟康唑有抗药性,则改用棘金and素。但是,由于氟康唑的购置成本低,因此可以继续用作一线治疗。因此,本研究的目的是评估与法国和德国的逐步升级策略相比,使用米卡芬净的逐步升级策略对预算的影响。方法:使用预算影响模型将降级与升级策略进行比较。除了生存率,还考虑了临床成功率(与真菌感染有关的症状和放射影像异常的缓解/减轻),以及真菌学上的成功率(从血液中清除念珠菌)。卫生经济成果包括根据临床成功率和真菌学成功率得出的每个健康状态的成本,以及预算影响。使用了42天的时间范围。结果:对于所有SCI患者,使用降级而不是升级对预算的影响更大,但是降级明显改善了生存率,临床成功率和真菌学成功率。降级药与升级药相比,氟康唑耐药菌株的临床成功率和生存率提高了约72%,在法国和德国每位患者分别节省了6,374欧元和356欧元的费用;降级与升级相比,真菌学成功率提高约72%并没有节省成本。结论:该模型提供了证据,表明在有唑耐药性感染风险的个体中治疗SCI时,米卡芬净降级具有潜在的成本节省和临床成功率提高的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号