...
首页> 外文期刊>Civil and Environmental Research >An Evaluation of the Energy Consumption and Co2 Emission associated with Corn Cob Ash Compared with the Cement Clinker
【24h】

An Evaluation of the Energy Consumption and Co2 Emission associated with Corn Cob Ash Compared with the Cement Clinker

机译:与水泥熟料相比,玉米芯粉尘的能耗和CO2排放评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study compares the energy consumption and the carbon dioxide emission associated with the production of Corn Cob Ash with a view to determining its viability and environmental sustainability as a pozzolan. CCA meeting the requirements of ASTM C618-12 (1994) was produced through two separate processes of open air burning and controlled incineration in an electric muffle furnace. In the first method the quantity of kerosene fuel used in the burning process was measured used in computing the external energy input and the associated CO 2 emission, using published World Bank data on heating, thermodynamic property and carbon content of various fuels. In the second method, the energy consumption was computed as a product of the name plate rating (in KW) of the muffle furnace and the time taken (in hours) to turn the measured quantity of corn cob to ash. The result reveals the ash yield of corn cob as an average of 3.6% and 1.7% for open air burning and controlled incineration respectively. Corresponding values for energy consumption were 4.3MJ and 216166MJ per kg of ash respectively. CO 2 emission associated with the fuel consumption in open air burning was 0.27Kg per Kg of pozzolanic ash. These compare more favorably with the corresponding data of 5.16MJ and 0.97Kg CO 2 established for Portland cement clinker production; in that less energy was consumed and less CO 2 was emitted and at the same time found an alternative use for the biomass waste. The paper concludes that CCA is a viable and environmentally sustainable source of pozzolan when it is derived from burning processes that take advantage of corn cob as a fuel, rather than being specially burnt in a furnace. The paper therefore recommends that biomass waste be should be promoted as a clean energy source and the resulting ash harnessed as pozzolan as a way of reducing the consumption of cement; leading to reduced green house gas emissions and contribution to global warming from the construction industry.
机译:这项研究比较了玉米芯粉煤灰生产过程中的能耗和二氧化碳排放量,以确定其作为火山灰的生存能力和环境可持续性。符合ASTM C618-12(1994)要求的CCA是通过在电马弗炉中进行两种独立的露天燃烧和受控焚烧工艺生产的。在第一种方法中,使用世界银行发布的有关各种燃料的加热,热力学性质和碳含量的数据,测量了燃烧过程中使用的煤油燃料量,以计算外部能量输入和相关的CO 2排放量。在第二种方法中,能耗是马弗炉的铭牌额定值(以KW为单位)与将测得的玉米芯转化为灰分所花费的时间(以小时为单位)的乘积。结果表明,露天燃烧和受控焚烧的玉米芯灰分平均分别为3.6%和1.7%。能源消耗的相应值分别为每千克灰分4.3MJ和216166MJ。与露天燃烧中的燃料消耗相关的CO 2排放量为每公斤火山灰灰0.27Kg。与波特兰水泥熟料生产所建立的5.16MJ和0.97Kg CO 2的相应数据相比,这些数据更为有利。因为减少了能源消耗,减少了CO 2的排放,同时找到了生物质废物的替代用途。本文的结论是,CCA是火山灰的可行且对环境可持续的来源,当它来自利用玉米芯作为燃料而不是在炉子中专门燃烧的燃烧过程中时。因此,本文建议应推广将生物质废物作为一种清洁能源,并利用灰烬作为火山灰来减少水泥的消耗。导致温室气体排放量减少,以及建筑行业对全球变暖的贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号