首页> 外文期刊>Clinical cardiology. >Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry
【24h】

Association of acute myocardial infarction cardiac arrest patient volume and in‐hospital mortality in the United States: Insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment And Intervention Outcomes Network Registry

机译:美国急性心肌梗死心脏骤停患者数量与院内死亡率的关联:国家心血管数据注册机构的见解急性冠脉治疗和干预结果网络注册机构

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Little is known about how differences in out of hospital cardiac arrest patient volume affect in‐hospital myocardial infarction (MI) mortality. Hypothesis Hospitals accepting cardiac arrest transfers will have increased hospital MI mortality. Methods MI patients (ST elevation MI [STEMI] and non‐ST elevation MI [NSTEMI]) in the Acute Coronary Treatment Intervention Outcomes Network Registry were included. Hospital variation of cardiac arrest and temporal trend of the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients were explored. Hospitals were divided into tertiles based on the proportion of cardiac arrest MI patients, and association between in‐hospital mortality and hospital tertiles of cardiac arrest was compared using logistic regression adjusting for case mix. Results A total of 252?882 patients from 224 hospitals were included, of whom 9682 (3.8%) had cardiac arrest (1.6% of NSTEMI and 7.5% of STEMI patients). The proportion of MI patients who had cardiac arrest admitted to each hospital was relatively low (median 3.7% [25th, 75th percentiles: 3.0%, 4.5%]).with a range of 4.2% to 12.4% in the high‐volume tertiles. Unadjusted in‐hospital mortality increased with tertile: low 3.8%, intermediate 4.6%, and high 4.7% ( P 0.001); this was no longer significantly different after adjustment (intermediate vs high tertile odds ratio (OR)?= 1.02; 95% confidence interval [0.90‐1.16], low vs high tertile OR?= 0.93 [0.83, 1.05]). Conclusions The proportion of MI patients who have cardiac arrest is low. In‐hospital mortality among all MI patients did not differ significantly between hospitals that had increased proportions of cardiac arrest MI patients. For most hospitals, overall MI mortality is unlikely to be adversely affected by treating cardiac arrest patients with MI.
机译:背景知识院外心脏骤停患者数量的差异如何影响院内心肌梗死(MI)死亡率知之甚少。假设接受心脏骤停转移的医院将增加医院MI的死亡率。方法纳入急性冠脉介入治疗结果网络注册中心的MI患者(ST升高MI [STEMI]和非ST升高MI [NSTEMI])。探讨了心搏骤停的医院变化和心梗心肌梗死患者比例的时间趋势。根据心梗心脏骤停患者的比例将医院划分为三分位数,并通过对病例组合进行逻辑回归调整,比较院内死亡率与心跳骤停医院三分位数之间的关联。结果共纳入224家医院的252-882名患者,其中9682名(3.8%)患有心脏骤停(NSTEMI为1.6%,STEMI为7.5%)。每家医院接受心脏骤停的MI患者的比例相对较低(中位数为3.7%[第25、75个百分位数:3.0%,4.5%])。高容量三分位数的比例为4.2%至12.4%。未调整的住院死亡率随三分位数的增加而增加:低3.8%,中度4.6%和高4.7%(P <0.001);调整后,这不再有显着差异(中位数与高位数的比值比(OR)= 1.02; 95%置信区间[0.90-1.16],三位数或低值或高值OR = 0.93 [0.83,1.05])。结论心脏骤停的MI患者所占比例较低。在心跳骤停心肌梗死患者比例增加的医院之间,所有心肌梗死患者的院内死亡率无显着差异。对于大多数医院而言,治疗心肌梗死性心肌梗死患者不太可能对整体心梗死亡产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号