首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and Translational Allergy >Usefulness of skin tests in penicillin-allergic patients after cephalosporins challenge
【24h】

Usefulness of skin tests in penicillin-allergic patients after cephalosporins challenge

机译:头孢菌素激发后对青霉素过敏患者进行皮肤试验的有用性

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundSubjects with a history of documented penicillin allergybut with negative skin test results for cephalosporins, cantolerate subsequent challenge doses of cephalosporin withoutan allergic reaction. [1]. In immediate reactions tobetalactams (BL), in some instances, specificity was mainlydirected to the BL inducing the reaction, but in othercases specificity was mainly directed to another structure,probably related with previous BL exposure [2].MethodsBetween November 2011 and October 2013, we prospectivelyrecruited a total population of 100 (71 women,29 men) patients from the outpatients of the ClinicalImmunology Unit (Florence, Italy). Patients had a historyof immediate reactions to at least one penicillin (Tab. 1)and positive results on skin tests for one or more penicillinreagents (penicilloyl-polylysine, minor determinant mixture,and benzylpenicillin), one or more semi-syntheticpenicillins (amoxicillin, ampicillin), or both [3]. We alsoevaluated sensitization to cephalosporins by using skintests [4] with second-generation (cefuroxime), and thirdgeneration(ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime)cephalosporins. In cases of negative results for all of thesecefalosporins, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone were administeredto consenting patients [1].Results74 of the 100 patients underwent challenges with oralcefuroxime axetil and intramuscular ceftriaxone: all toleratedthe challenge. After about a month we repeatedthe skin tests with PPL, MDM, and the two cephalosporinsadministered (cefuroxime and ceftriaxone).8 patients (10.8%) presented new sensitizations: 2 forMDM, 2 for PPL and MDM, 1 for cefuroxime, 1 for ceftriaxone,1 for PPL and ceftriaxone, 1 for PPL, MDM,cefuroxime and ceftriaxone. 26 patients refused the doublechallenge and only underwent a tolerance to cefuroximeaxetil test. In one of these the challenge waspositive. The skin tests after a month with PPL, MDM,and the cephalosporin administered (cefuroxime) presentednew sensitizations in only one patient (4.0%),for PPL.ConclusionOne month after the challenge, the percentage of sensitizationseems to be higher in patients who underwent tolerancetests with two cephalosporins. It would be useful tohave more data available to confirm the above mentionedassumptions, but above all it would be useful to know ifwe can recommend the cephalosporins tolerated withnegative skin tests after a month, even if associated withpositive PPL and/or MDM and/or other cephalosporinadministered with the tolerance test.
机译:背景:具有记录的青霉素过敏史但头孢菌素皮肤试验结果阴性的受试者可以耐受随后的头孢菌素激发剂量而无过敏反应。 [1]。在某些情况下,对内酰胺(BL)的直接反应中,特异性主要针对诱导反应的BL,而在其他情况下,特异性主要针对另一种结构,可能与以前的BL暴露有关[2]。方法:2011年11月至2013年10月,我们前瞻性地从临床免疫学部门(意大利佛罗伦萨)的门诊招募了100名患者(71名女性,29名男性)。患者对至少一种青霉素(表1)有立即反应的历史,并且一种或多种青霉素试剂(青霉素-多赖氨酸,次要决定性混合物和苄青霉素),一种或多种半合成青霉素(阿莫西林,氨苄青霉素)的皮肤试验阳性),或同时使用[3]。我们还通过使用第二代(头孢呋辛)和第三代(头孢他啶,头孢曲松和头孢噻肟)头孢菌素的皮试[4]来评估对头孢菌素的敏感性。在所有这些头孢菌素均阴性的情况下,对同意的患者给予头孢呋辛和头孢曲松[1]。结果100例患者中74例接受口服头孢呋辛酯和肌内头孢曲松的攻击:所有患者均耐受该挑战。大约一个月后,我们重复进行了PPL,MDM和两个头孢菌素(头孢呋辛和头孢曲松)的皮肤测试。8例患者(10.8%)出现了新的致敏性:MDM 2例,PPL和MDM 2例,头孢呋辛1例,头孢曲松1例, PPL和头孢曲松为1,PPL,MDM,头孢呋辛和头孢曲松为1。 26名患者拒绝了双重挑战,仅接受了头孢呋辛酯试验的耐受性。其中一项挑战是积极的。用PPL,MDM和头孢菌素(头孢呋辛)给药一个月后的皮肤测试仅对PPL的一名患者(4.0%)表现出新的致敏性。结论攻击后一个月,接受耐受性测试的患者的致敏率似乎更高。与两个头孢菌素。拥有更多可用的数据来确认上述假设将是有用的,但最重要的是,知道我们是否可以推荐一个月后是否可以推荐头孢菌素耐受阴性皮肤试验,即使与阳性PPL和/或MDM和/或其他头孢菌素相关联与公差测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号