首页> 外文期刊>Clinical cardiology. >Quantitative segmental analysis of myocardial perfusion to differentiate stress cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction: A myocardial contrast echocardiography study
【24h】

Quantitative segmental analysis of myocardial perfusion to differentiate stress cardiomyopathy from acute myocardial infarction: A myocardial contrast echocardiography study

机译:心肌灌注定量分段分析以区分应激性心肌病和急性心肌梗死:心肌造影超声心动图研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Abstract BackgroundBoth stress cardiomyopathy (SCMP) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) present with similar clinical symptoms and signs, and apical akinesis. Hypothesis: Quantitative segmental analysis of myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) helps to differentiate AMI from SCMP. MethodsReal-time MCE was performed in 33 consecutive patients who presented with an acute symptom/sign and a new apical akinesis on echocardiography. In 18 left ventricular (LV) myocardial segments, a replenishment curve was obtained in each segment to measure peak plateau myocardial contrast intensity (MCI) (A) and the replenishment curve slope (β). The calibrated MCI was also measured in each segment. ResultsAmong 33 patients, 22 were diagnosed with SCMP and 11 were diagnosed with AMI according to comprehensive diagnostic criteria. A, β, Aβ, and the calibrated MCI were lower in akinetic than in normokinetic segments in both the SCMP and AMI groups. In the akinetic segments, A, β, Aβ, and the calibrated MCI in SCMP patients were each higher than those in AMI patients. In patient-based analyses, areas under the ROC curves of A, β, Aβ, and the calibrated MCI for diagnosing AMI were 0.769, 0.607, 0.822, and 0.934, respectively. The optimal cutoff values to diagnose AMI were Aβ? ConclusionsAlthough myocardial perfusion is relatively reduced in the akinetic segments of SCMP, a quantitative segmental analysis of myocardial perfusion using MCE helps to discriminate AMI from SCMP.
机译:摘要背景应激性心肌病(SCMP)和急性心肌梗死(AMI)均表现出相似的临床症状和体征,并伴有根尖运动。假设:心肌对比超声心动图(MCE)的定量分段分析有助于区分AMI和SCMP。方法对33例出现急性症状/体征并在超声心动图上出现新的心尖运动的连续患者进行实时MCE检查。在18个左心室(LV)心肌节段中,在每个节段中获得一条补充曲线,以测量高原心肌对比强度峰值(MCI)(A)和补充曲线斜率(β)。在每个段中还测量了校准的MCI。结果根据综合诊断标准,在33例患者中,诊断为SCMP的22例,诊断为AMI的11例。在SCMP和AMI组中,A,β,Aβ和校正的MCI的运动性均低于正常运动的节段。在运动学方面,SCMP患者的A,β,Aβ和校正后的MCI均高于AMI患者。在基于患者的分析中,用于诊断AMI的A,β,Aβ和校准的MCI的ROC曲线下的面积分别为0.769、0.607、0.822和0.934。诊断AMI的最佳临界值为Aβ?结论尽管SCMP的运动学部分心肌灌注相对减少,但使用MCE定量分析心肌灌注有助于将AMI与SCMP区别开来。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号