...
首页> 外文期刊>Ciência Rural >Comparative assessment of the food purchase program and the national school feeding program's impact in Ub??, Minas Gerais, Brazil
【24h】

Comparative assessment of the food purchase program and the national school feeding program's impact in Ub??, Minas Gerais, Brazil

机译:对食品购买计划和国家学校供餐计划对巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州Ub ??的影响进行比较评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Food Purchase Program (PAA) and the National School Feeding Program (PNAE) are the main trading programs of Brazil that promote a connection between the family farm and institutional markets. The case study portrayed in this article aimed to evaluate and compare the socioeconomic impacts generated by the PAA and PNAE among Ub??'s family farmers in Minas Gerais. To do this, two tipes of questionnaires were applied to managers and farmers who participate in the programs and obtained data were analyzed by descriptive statistic methods and non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney). Results showed that the two policies present positive socioeconomic benefits to family farmers, although the PNAE's producers income be higher and the food prices traded in PAA are superior. On the other side, having participated in the PAA and PNAE does not provide extra income arising from entry into new markets, which in theory could be the result of improving the quality of production,and does not promote the reduction in the use of fertilizers and pesticides.
机译:食品购买计划(PAA)和国家学校供餐计划(PNAE)是巴西的主要贸易计划,旨在促进家庭农场与机构市场之间的联系。本文所述的案例研究旨在评估和比较PAA和PNAE对米纳斯吉拉斯州Ub ??的家庭农民产生的社会经济影响。为此,向参与该计划的管理人员和农民应用了两个调查表技巧,并通过描述性统计方法和非参数检验(Mann-Whitney)对获得的数据进行了分析。结果表明,尽管PNAE的生产者收入较高且PAA中交易的食品价格较高,但这两项政策为家庭农民带来了积极的社会经济利益。另一方面,参加PAA和PNAE并不会因进入新市场而获得额外收入,从理论上讲,这可能是提高生产质量的结果,并且不会促进减少肥料和肥料的使用。农药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号